Feminists boast there are more females than males now enrolled at university as evidence women are superior to men. But what percentage of females graduate with feminist degrees? Unproductive man-hating degrees that would qualify them best for HR positions – where they have free rein to persecute and eliminate men.
Alexander Grace’s video below is about US circumstances. However, much of it would apply to Australia.
One should read the informative comments from males after the video.
Tom Golden’s substack MEN ARE GOOD is highly recommended.
*****
Tom Golden, Dec 05, 2024
In a previous post, we explored why men often choose not to fight back against women. Many reasons tie back to their biologically and socially driven desire for social status. Men tend to carefully assess conflicts, aiming to maximize gains while minimizing losses. Maintaining high status, especially within hierarchical structures, requires significant effort. These dynamics—marked by unexpected rises and falls—have shaped men’s behavior for generations.
However, beginning in the 1970s, feminists began weaponizing gynocentrism, using it as a protective shield while directing hateful accusations at men. If men were to treat women similarly, they would face immediate chastisement and punishment. Instead, feminists exploited their societal gynocentric privilege destructively, prioritizing their own agendas.
Initially, this hostility manifested in labels like “chauvinists” or “pigs.” Over time, unchecked accusations escalated, with men increasingly blamed for nearly every difficulty feminists perceived. Consider the many labels feminists have used to describe men over the years:
Now, imagine if men’s groups conjured similar names for women. How long would such groups last? Would they garner media support? Not a chance. Gynocentrism allows feminists to spew hatred without consequence, often gaining widespread backing.
In another brilliant analysis, Janice Fiamengo demonstrates where Trump won the presidency.
******
Janice Fiamengo, Nov 15, 2024
In the week following the American election results, a consensus of sorts has emerged: this was about men.
Whether in distasteful embrace of “bro” masculinity, or in celebration of a world in which “male traits can build rather than destroy” (in the surprisingly sympathetic words of Quillette’s Claire Lehmann), men were the ones who determined the election outcome, so the story goes. Donald Trump was victorious over Kamala Harris because he gave men permission to reject feminist dictates, including about abortion.
A good deal of the commentary on this theme, not surprisingly, has been negative, ranging from the sneering to the hysterical. There have also been raucous celebrations and upbeat analyses of the “rebellion of American men.” Even amidst the male-blaming and catastrophizing, the talk of sex strikes and husband-poisoning, there have been signs that the era of men being taken for granted as voters may at last be coming to an end.
Democrat Richard Reeves of the Brookings Institution under-stated the case when he pointed out that “Trying to either shame or guilt or scare men into voting Democrat was spectacularly unsuccessful.” Future Democratic campaigns, he suggests, will have to take men into account. Whether the Trump presidency will deliver on the hopes now raised among some men’s advocates remains to be seen.
*****
First, a review: the Democratic campaign vision for men was notable for its anti-male contempt.
Democrats promoted a progressive masculinity, one that was explicitly subservient to women. Francis Wilkinson at Bloomberg praised VP candidate Tim Walz as a man who “can happily play second fiddle to a Black woman” and “doesn’t have to live in constant fear of losing status.” In case the implied insult to imagined Republican men (with their fragile masculinity) was not clear enough, Wilkinson concluded his piece with a direct address: “He’s not frightened of women, afraid of Black people or terrified of the future. Why are you?”
Riffing on the same theme, Sam Berry at The Los Angeles Loyalan, a campus newspaper, celebrated Walz for his “gentle masculinity” and willingness to “take a backseat to his running mate.” A soft man happy to play a supporting role to a DEI presidential candidate was purportedly attractive to young people (by which he seemed to mean young women). Berry interviewed a sociology professor at UC Santa Barbara who saw it as a positive that “Walz overall doesn’t express his masculinity” (whatever that means) and who asserted that “People [by which she seemed to mean women] are more happy to see a man support a woman in power rather than using his role as a man in society to benefit his own self.”
For an uncompromising defence of patriarchy, one can consult Timothy Gordon’s youtube channel. He and his wife operate as a fantastic duo, Tim going in hard for a naturally constructed man. His thoughts are laid out in full, together with a theoretical demonstration, in his book The Case for Patriarchy. His wife, Stephanie, backs him up solidly with her book Ask Your Husband: A Wife’s Guide to True Femininity. I might add that Tim enjoys the singular privilege of having a wife who laughs at his jokes.
There is much devoted to the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church, but the fantastic duo’s views on men and women – and their union – will reach across religions and philosophies.
The Albanese government has gifted five billion dollars to the worst feminist man-haters in Australia to persecute men, driving many to suicide. In Bettina Arndt’s latest post, read an anonymous policeman’s heart-breaking account of the weaponised use of a Domestic Violence Protection Order by an unconscionable woman and her feminist abettors.
*****
Bettina Arndt, Oct 27, 2024
The feminists have it all sewn up. All it took was very effective bullying of politicians to have draconian legislation pushed through various state parliaments resulting in unproven domestic violence accusations flooding our criminal law system.
My focus today is on the reluctant enforcers required to do the dirty work for this evil regime – namely our co-opted police officers. I receive regular emails from these long-suffering people, many of whom are appalled at finding themselves having to enforce such unjust laws.
Here’s a letter I received recently from a Queensland police officer:
Continue reading Five billion dollars to persecute menAfter a broad survey of what feminist academics and teachers say about toxic, misogynistic schoolboys, Janice Fiamengo makes the comment:
‘If ever a case were to be made for all-male schools and all-male teaching staff, this document (by feminists) could be a primary exhibit.‘
I’ve been saying for years that boys need men to teach them. Not just any men, but manly men with a high sense of what it means to be a respectful, self-disciplined, self-sufficient man.
Once schools could tolerate females teaching boys, but that was when there were male teachers who could intervene when boys stepped out of line with female teachers. That is no longer the case. The education system has driven men out of the sector, leaving women – particularly young women – defenseless against restless boys.
Continue reading Feminist brutalization of boysTeen Vogue columnist Emily Lindin openly announced, “If some innocent men’s reputations have to take a hit in the process of undoing the patriarchy, that is a price I am absolutely willing to pay.” Lindin also boasted, “I’m actually not at all concerned about innocent men losing their jobs over false sexual assault/harassment allegations.”
*****
Coalition to End Domestic Violence
September 17, 2024 – International Falsely Accused Day was observed on September 9, with events held in 12 countries around the world (1). The highlight was an official statement by Victoria Villarruel, Vice President of Argentina.
Villarruel revealed how feminists are promoting the use of false allegations, thereby “breaking the principle of equality before the law, of innocence and defense; destroying the ties of thousands of families, and mainly many parents who can’t see their children.” (2)
Villarruel was certainly aware of the highly publicized allegations against Argentinian soccer coach Diego Guacci, accused of sexual harassment of five female soccer players. In response, Guacci denied all the accusations and provided a list of more than 100 potential witnesses to support his case. In the end, the FIFA Ethics Committee found the charges lacked merit, concluding that “the evidence on file is insufficient to corroborate, to its comfortable satisfaction, the players’ account of the events.” (3)
Many men – probably most men – simply can’t follow the ‘reasoning’ behind much feminist activism. It takes the keen analytical mind of Janice Fiamengo to sort through the irrationality for them. The article below is a brilliant example of her comprehensively tearing apart feminist discourse and activism.
I’m at the point in my life where I just wish that women would get dressed and stay dressed in public. I’ve seen enough bare breasts and big bums to last more than a lifetime.
*****
Janice Fiamengo Sep 14, 2024
Not long ago, a British campaign for affirmative consent legislation featured images of women paired with the slogan “I’m asking for it.” The whole point, of course, is that they’re not asking for “it”. The phrase is meant to evoke men who justify their sexual assaults of women by claiming that the victim wanted to be raped. What the women are asking for is legislation to make it a criminal offence for a man to have a sexual encounter with a woman without eliciting an explicit “Yes” from her at every stage (how far we have moved from the relatively simple “No means no”).
Continue reading Negotiating the tangle of feminist irrationalityJanice Fiamengo, Sep 01, 2024
One can sense the beginning of a joke: a radical feminist (barrister Charlotte Proudman), a men’s advocate (Ally Fogg of the Men and Boys Coalition), and a professor who studies the manosphere (cyber threat specialist Joe Whittaker) walk into a BBC studio to discuss the UK government’s announced plan to tackle misogyny (BBC Sounds, “Should some forms of misogyny be classed as extremism?”). The joke is that no real debate occurs, despite Fogg’s contention that boys and men are as much victims as victimizers. Overall, the three agree that extreme misogyny is a “serious” “pervasive” problem, that it is prevalent throughout online men’s discussions (in the so-called “manosphere”), and that boys and men must be educated out of any tendency to direct anger at women or feminism.
Continue reading Legalizing man-hatredThe Albanese leftist government has allocated almost 5 billion dollars to feminists to persecute men and lock them up wherever possible. It is an irony that Janice Fiamengo’s latest comment has just appeared.
*****
The real (male) victims of false allegations are often quickly passed over
Janice Fiamengo, Sep 05, 2024
“Better ten innocent men go to jail than one potential female victim hesitate to come forward.”
At least, that seemed to be the consensus in 2017, when I first made this video. I’m not sure it’s still entirely true, though I do often hear the ‘Ultimately, this will hurt women …’ argument when the subject is male disadvantage or blatant anti-male injustice.
This video was originally part of the No Joke Janice video series, designed by my friend and producer Steve Brule as short audio commentary on current events. (Over time, many of the videos became indistinguishable from the main Fiamengo File videos, longer and more detailed—before they were all taken down by YouTube’s censors in one fell swoop. Steve is now re-posting many of them at Studio B.)