Who gives a sh*t about men? – certainly not feminists entrenched in the law and government

Edvard Munch, “Despair/Wikimedia Commons

Feminism to Forlorn Men: Go Hang

Bettina Arndt, Quadrant, May 06 2026

Last Christmas, one of Australia’s major suicide prevention groups had a call from a very distressed, suicidal man. The counsellor did his best to support him and arranged to keep in touch. But there was no answer to the counsellor’s follow up calls. Following their organisation’s duty of care rules, the counsellor made a call to NSW police, fearing the man was at imminent risk of harm.

The police reaction was shocking. “Is there a female partner who could be at risk? Is he likely to hurt her,” asked the police officer, whose immediate concern was not checking on the man in crisis but rather assessing the risk that the suicidal man could be violent.

Welcome to the latest triumph of feminist policy innovation: a system that looks at the man standing on the edge of the abyss — the group dying by suicide at three times the rate of women — and decides the most urgent question to ask is not ‘How do we save you?’ but ‘Have you been hurting women?’ It is a policy of breathtaking intellectual dishonesty and moral inversion.

It all started in Victoria but could become official policy across the country The 2021 Victorian government’s MARAM Framework Document is prescribed for over 6,000 organisations and approximately 392,000 professionals in Victoria, including mental health, drug/alcohol, homelessness, family and health services.  The Framework is based on the premise that significant numbers of men who commit suicide each year have a history of using family violence. Responding to suicide risk “should consider the risk of the person using violence to themselves, their family and community,” explains the document.

Read the rest HERE

A grotesque man demonstrates our judicial insanity

Tell Pauline Hanson that you will vote for One Nation if she and her party reform the Human Rights Commission (sack the people there) and repeal the legislation that allows men to indiscriminately invade women’s spaces – including toilets, locker rooms and bathrooms.

Australia’s dominant political class needs to have huge doses of electric shock therapy.

The madness of Native Title. Where will it end? Multiple white Aboriginal millionaires is where

Native title holders awarded more than $54m for economic, spiritual loss from NT’s McArthur River Mine

A serious-looking man in a hat an a red shirt looking to the side, with a river and bushland in the background.
Jack Green was among the claimants who took the NT government to court for compensation over operations at the McArthur River Mine site outside Borroloola. (ABC News: Michael Franchi)

In short:

The Federal Court has ordered the Northern Territory government to pay more than $54 million compensation to Gudanji, Yanyuwa and Yanyuwa-Marra traditional owners.

The compensation is for economic and spiritual losses associated with the establishment and expansion of the McArthur River Mine near Borroloola.

It marks only the second time a court has calculated compensation for native title losses, the first being the landmark Timber Creek case in 2019.

Native title holders for the land surrounding one of Australia’s largest mining operations have been awarded more than $54 million in compensation for “intergenerational and enduring” economic and spiritual loss.

The court ruling is only the second of its kind in Australia’s history and could have implications for native title groups, governments and private industry around the country

Read the rest HERE . . .