I made the introduction to my YouTube channel below in June 2024. I will update it in the following months. The update will include an adjustment to my list of books. In the meantime, I have published the fourth book in my Sixties Series, The Counterculture Goddess, with the fifth, Love in the Counterculture, due in April. I have also republished Bitter in Love under its original title, Editing Constance: A Jane Austen Story.
It’s not only demonic. It’s a demonstration of the hysteria, irrationality, and narcissism that possess young women. At the front of all leftist/woke demonstrations, you’ll find cockeyed young women like this. It’s time to consider reintroducing abortion laws.
It’s a funny world we live in. The Albanese government uttered strong support for America’s violent military action to wipe out Ali Khamenei’s brutal Islamic government, while Islamic mosques in Australia mourn the death of Khamenei, while the Labor government has purposefully brought hundreds of thousands of Islamic migrants into Australia to populate a Trojan horse. Could it get madder?
*****
‘Sky News host Andrew Bolt calls out the Islamic leaders in Australia mourning the death of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Mr Bolt said Labor has been funding mosques, which are actively mourning his death. “The Masjid Arrahman Mosque … it’s also held a commemoration ceremony for three killed Hezbollah fighters, yet it has been given $33,000 by the NSW Government.”’
I remark again that most men have little idea of the feminist hatred they’ll meet if ever they end up before the bench. Women, or more accurately, feminists, have possession of our legal system. That will get worse because universities are churning out more female lawyers than male lawyers. Why should that matter, the average man will ask? The law is the law.
The explanation is provided by the crucial distinction Janice Fiamengo and Helen Andrews make between female and male judgment: males judge on the basis of raw logic and truth: females judge on the basis of empathy. Helen Andrews puts it this way: females ‘value empathy over rationality; safety over risk; conformity and cohesion over competition and hierarchy.’
Bettina Arndt gives a graphic illustration below of the ordeal a male will likely endure if ever brought before the courts by an accusing female. All the sympathy is for the female; none whatever for the male. It is not a question of fact and rationality, but of feeling and female solidarity.
Scottish Judges
A Grim Verdict on Scottish Justice
Bettina Arndt, Quadrant, 27 Feb 22026
Across the world, feminist legal academics are bullying politicians and legislators into adopting new measures aimed at increasing rape convictions. The result, year after year, is justice systems increasingly tilted to favour accusers, undermining the right to a fair trial for men, and increasing the likelihood that innocent men will be convicted.
Scotland’s judges were doing well in this macabre race to the bottom, but now they have suffered a setback. A UK Supreme Court has warned that Scottish courts are violating a defendant’s right to a fair trial. Scottish lawyers are claiming this could mean hundreds of men in prison will be lining up for appeals or possible compensation for false imprisonment.
It isn’t so much the laws which have been at fault but the way Scottish judges are choosing to interpret them – namely by denying juries critical evidence that might have been used to exonerate the accused men.
They have taken rape shield laws, designed to protect the accuser from humiliating questions about their sexual history or character, and used these to exclude evidence critical to an understanding of what actually happened between the two people.
A leading Scottish barrister, Thomas Ross KC, has been outspoken about what is going on there. He’s in a unique position to expose this injustice because, after handling over 100 rape cases, in 2022 he threw in the towel because he felt it was no longer possible to properly defend accused men. “I was just banging my head against a brick wall and getting nowhere.” Ross decided he’d be better off walking away from this territory so he could speak publicly about what is going on.
The video below shows how pervasive female influence and control are across the arts world – through publishing, television, media, advertising, etc. If you’re a male (like me) writing stories and characters that men are traditionally interested in, you can forget about being published by a traditional publisher – no matter how excellent your writing is. If you’re a male who finds the latest offerings in bookshops, television and cinema feminist and boring, you’ll find the the explanation here. This video is worth rewatching for its explanatory value.
It’s the same in Australia as in Britain. The voting figures in the video below show that the majority of women and migrants from poor countries vote left. Men who vote Labor, Greens, and TEAL are voting against themselves. They are voting for parties and policies that heavily discriminate against them and the nation their ancestors built.
Worried about the boys in your life? Be warned. Our government is out to get them. In early January, when our country was still reeling from the Bondi Massacre, all the talk was about violent extremism. We watched the disgraceful Albanese government ducking and weaving to avoid naming Islamic extremism as the ideology which inspired that appalling event.
How convenient that on January 7, the day before our Prime Minister finally caved and agreed to the Royal Commission, our media was diverted by a news story reporting on a Melbourne University study into what they claimed was another driver of violent extremism. You guessed it – misogyny.
“Almost 40 per cent of Australian boys support violent extremist ideologies while more than a third have misogynistic attitudes towards women,” spluttered outraged media reports. Newspapers quoted Dr Sara Meger, the lead researcher, who said her findings revealed strong and significant correlations between misogynist attitudes and support for violent extremism. Apparently “disturbingly high” anti-feminist views were held by the boys aged 13 to 17 included in the study. And that’s the real point – they say “misogyny,” but they mean disagreeing with feminist beliefs.
The timely release of this unpublished research comes as no surprise. Sara Meger has been targeting boys for many years now and this was an ideal moment to attract international attention. The feminist scholar is a lecturer in feminist international relations and international security, and this new research is simply the latest round of her ongoing project on “Misogyny and Youth Radicalisation Leading to Violent Extremism.”
More about this deeply flawed, nonsensical research later. What’s important to understand is that the feminist mafia controlling our universities have been linking misogyny to extremism for nearly a decade.Check out the Australian Institute of International Affairs, a respected thinktank precluded under its charter from promoting ideology. Yet from 2018 onwards this organisation has been publishing articles identifying misogyny as a form of violent extremism. The most recent example, by Deakin University lecturer Dr Shannon Zimmerman, quotes UN Security Council Resolution 1325 which ludicrously claims “conflict and war have a disproportionate impact on women and girls.” Hmmm, apart from all those dead soldiers, who are almost all men. Zimmerman argues that it follows “special effort is needed to be taken to ensure the protection of women and girls from violence” and this requires addressing gender-based responses to extremism – which is her claimed expertise.
There are dozens of similar examples of feminist academics across Australia pushing this line, publishing articles, speaking at conferences, and making submissions to national security inquiries arguing that misogyny is a cause, sometimes even the cause of right-wing extremism. And they are packing a punch.