The Great Betrayal

Posted on by
Reply

It’s war by lawfare. The nation of Australia, founded by the Anglo-Celtic settlers on 26 January 1788, is under attack by its elite class, who are hell-bent on giving it away to a bunch of fake Aboriginals. This is all the result of the Native Title Act, forced on us by that bastard Paul Keating. It’s time to repeal that treasonous act. Read Robert Hill’s article carefully. This state of affairs has been long predictable.

The elites are playing with fire.

Naarm Rising, Part I: The Claim on Melbourne

Robert Hill, Quadrant, Nov 05 2026

On October 30, 2026,  law firm Ashurst Perkins Coie delivered a blunt warning about Melbourne’s native title claim: public land inside the claim area can no longer be dealt with as though native title were irrelevant. The registered claim already triggers procedural consequences under the Native Title Act, and governments, developers and land users are being told to protect their position now. If native title is ultimately recognised, affected public land will carry an additional enforceable legal interest that future dealings must accommodate.

In plain English: Melbourne public land now carries a potential native title encumbrance. Ignore it at your peril.

Melbourne is presently heading down a Native Title consent path. At the Federal Court case-management hearing on July 28, 2026, the claimants indicated that they were pursuing a consent determination or agreement with the Victorian and Commonwealth governments. That means the historical foundations of these claimed rights may never be tested through a fully contested trial.

Then comes the political significance. Ashurst expressly points to the Victorian election on November 28, 2026, and tells affected parties to watch for any change in the government’s approach to settling native title claims. It says the election may shape the outcome and notes that the Coalition has committed to dismantling significant elements of Victoria’s existing Treaty framework, an attitude Ashurst says may affect its approach to native-title settlements.

Read the rest HERE . . .

Self-righteous emotionalism – the judiciary under threat

Posted on by
Reply

The Lindsay Clancy Case Shows Why Civilization Must Reject Feminine “Ethics”

The jury system cannot survive moral illogic and the refusal of objectivity

Janice Fiamengo, Sep 26, 2026

It’s difficult to assess the prevalence of the Clancy phenomenon, in which a female-dominated consensus, sentimental and vicious, formed swiftly around the alleged suffering and humanity of a woman who killed her three children in a premeditated act.

A YouGov poll from early in September showed that the difference between men’s and women’s reactions to the trial was not as stark as one might have expected from the public furor (women were more likely by about 10 points to support a verdict of not guilty).

But it’s fair to say that the thousands of women—and a few men—expressing impassioned identification with Clancy represent at least a troubling minority whose voices are dangerously amplified in our public culture. Their self-righteous emotionalism corrodes the priority of reason in public life, especially the commitment to equality before the law.

The centering of women’s suffering has a long history. Here, I focus on one relatively little known, but powerful, influence that highlights the connection between feminist rationalizations of abortion and Clancy supporters’ tacit acceptance of child-murder.

Read the rest HERE . . .

An update on the state of book publishing

Posted on by
Reply

The book publishing industry has undergone enormous change over the last twenty years and breathless change over the last five years. The relationship between traditional publishers and Indie publishing is constantly shifting. Traditional publishers are now looking at the bestsellers in the Indie market. Lara Helmling provides an excellent overview.

Australia’s changing population – changing the face of the nation

Posted on by
Reply

Australia’s population by country of birth

Statistics on Australia’s estimated resident population by country of birth

Reference period: Jun 2025, Australian Bureau of Statistics.

Key statistics

  • At 30 June 2025, Australia’s population included 8.8 million people who were born overseas.
  • The proportion of Australia’s population born outside Australia was 32.0%.
  • India, England, China, and New Zealand were the countries of birth with the largest populations.
  • Those born in India recorded the largest increase since 2015.

Australia’s population by country of birth

As at 30 June 2025, Australia’s estimated resident population was 27.6 million people, comprising 18.8 million people born in Australia and 8.8 million people born overseas. 

  • Australia’s overseas-born population increased by 258,000 people in 2024-25.
  • The proportion of overseas-born increased to 32.0% in 2025, up from 31.5% in 2024.

Read the rest HERE . . .

Immigration – the power of ethnic voting blocks

Posted on by
Reply

Pauline Hanson has been media-bashed endlessly over her 1996 claim that Australia was ‘in danger of being swamped by Asians.’ Why has she been unmercifully media-bashed? Because the claim was untrue, or because Australia’s elite woke class forbade such claims, regardless of their truth?

The Australian Bureau of Statistics released 2025 figures showing the Chinese population approaching 800,000 and the Indian population 1,000,000. At what point would you use ‘swamped’? Well, really, we know it’s a case of the elite class suppressing information they don’t like. Foremost members of Australia’s elite controlling class are the propagandist instruments ABC and SBS, who smash anything they deem racist.

The Australian people have a chance to do something about migration in the 2025 Victorian State Election and in the Federal Election of 2028. It’s not numbers; it’s who is compatible with Australia’s culture, who is prepared to fit in, and not establish enclaves to create their own cultural hegemony. Indeed, we need to focus on people directly related to Australia’s original population to balance the skewing of immigration numbers over the last ten years.

‘Australians with ancestry going back to the 1800s to mid-1900s will ignore this video at their peril. Ethnic voting blocks are already happening. Suburbs in Sydney established in the 1800s and early 1900s by Australian and British settlers are now 90% Asian. The Chinese community voted against the Morrison government because of its vigorous resistance to the bullying of communist China. The loss of the Morrison government has been attributed to the critical shifting of the Chinese vote to the Labor Party. Australia must review its immigration policy before it’s too late.’

Pauline Hanson takes Muslim Faruqi to the High Court

Posted on by
Reply

Dr Joanna Howe is a champion. Few Australians on the conservative side are as active in taking the battle up to the miserable, destructive left. In this video, she shows that she is supporting Pauline Hanson in her battle with the despicable Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi, whose bigoted record speaks for itself. What an ironic joke that the appeal judge found in favour of Faruqi – Hanson was racist in her reply to Faruqi’s nastiness – when it is clear that, in all her actions and speeches, Faruqi hates white Anglo people.

Let me allude to a matter here that is of great significance. Do you see it? Joanna is actually a dark woman. Her ancestry is likely Indian or Sri Lankan, or somewhere in that part of the world. Who would dispute that she’s Australian? Who, except the small band of nutters who the bigots in the media use to smear the rest of us? As Pauline says, ethnicity isn’t the point. It is the people who are unashamedly incompatible with Australian culture, people who hate Australia and Australians, who are here to grab their piece of real estate, set up their enclave and pursue the hegemony of their culture.