You don’t have to scroll far into TikTok to find a series of middle-class school brats promoting a day off school to demonstrate against ‘fascist’ Pauline Hanson. For those of us who lived through the 1960s’ Marxist organisation of school kids’ demonstrations, it is deja vu all over again. The same rhetoric, the same slogans, and the same insufferable teenage brats, especially the insufferable female brats, who one will see at the forefront of leftist activity.
What will the school authorities do? Of course, they’ll cave into the brats from cushy middle-class homes, given great support by our propagandist ABC/SBS.
Tell Pauline Hanson you’ll vote for One Nation at the 2028 federal election if she does something about this sort of schoolgirl-boy delinquency.
In this video, Joomi Kim surveys and assesses recent novels by feminists that are being promoted and selling well. Her basic judgment is that ‘so much of it is infected by woke ideologies.’
Now, in this, Joomi is doing a service for men. She is reading novels full of feminist man-hatred, so we don’t have to read them, while it’s important for men to know what the enemy is thinking and scheming. Too many men are unaware of the permanent turmoil of women’s feelings.
Ignorance is not bliss in this case. Feminist man-hatred is embedded in all areas of modern society, which certainly affects, for one, a man’s employment opportunities. I recommend that men who come to my site watch this video. Forewarned is forearmed.
Feminism poses a threat to everything good in western culture, perhaps especially to women’s capacity to love, reason, and exercise self-restraint.
I was an adherent of feminism before I became a critic. I have felt its euphoric exultation and its self-flattering conviction of moral purity. Later, I recognized its hubris and moral hollowness.
I am familiar with feminism’s core texts, from Mary Wollstonecraft to Mary Anne Franks, having studied them and believed in them for years. I understand the psychology and the history of the movement because I lived inside it for many years.
Unlike others who have criticized feminism’s excesses, I contend that although there are some moderate feminists, there was never a moderate feminism inspired by reasonable goals and untainted by anti-male fanaticism. Feminism did not go wrong at some point in history, whether after the Second Wave or before, whether in anti-sex or pro-sex zeal. It was always rooted in resentment and envy, warped by utopian longings and false notions of female moral superiority.
Students, particularly males, wishing to achieve a useful vocational qualification would do well to choose something from TAFE before the woke crackpots get a hold on that, too.
Helen Andrews might not have fully demonstrated her thesis that women are at the centre or the cause of civilisational collapse, but much of what she asserts about the general difference between female and male moral thinking and decision-making makes sense and is observable. The script of this video is below.
Do you want to put it into a single sentence? You could say that feminisation equals wokeness. Everything you could think of as wokeness is simply an epiphenomenon (a by-product) of demographic feminisation.
‘Whiteness is the most violent fuckin’ system to ever breathe.’
The above is a declaration uttered by a ranting black activist in Joomi Kim’s video. It would be pointless to say, in reply, that one should survey the social status of the black population in America (there are abundant statistics), then survey the civilisational status of the black African states and then compare them with the countries of the West that are centuries ahead in every measure of civilisation.
In recent years, I have mused on the fact, everywhere evident, that I have the privilege of living during times of civilizational collapse. I must sit back of an evening and watch my kind destroying what took centuries to develop.
This is a question Ayaan Hirsi Ali urgently puts to the people whose ancestors – Europe’s Germanic tribes – created the modern world. She is worried it hasn’t. She’s worried the West is surrendering to its ideological and uncivilised enemies.
Helen Lewis knows how to articulate her point of view and, mercifully, she did not indulge in a feminist rant to highlight the dangers of ‘masculinism’ – typically the sort of coloured word the left spin to support their leftist views. She gives an interesting update or ‘state of the nation’ address on men and masculinity, a lot of it very true from my masculine perspective. But what she also does, as most feminist commentators do, is focus on the extreme elements and personalities in the rising fightback by men against an out-of-control feminism.
Feminists don’t know where to stop. Women are now in the majority of university enrolments, and in such professions as the law and medicine. Feminists have no trouble in accepting their favoured positions while going in boots and all in areas which men are naturally attracted to – the STEM field. They are blase about formulating strategies to favour women and discriminate against men by enforced quotas.
These are issues raised by Helen Andrews and Janice Fiamengo. Ms Lewis has ignored them and their objections. It is a logical conclusion that if women refuse to have children, the society, even the nation, in which they live will break down.
According to Janice Fiamengo, the evidence shows that women destroy civilisations because their decisions are driven by emotion. They are not able to take the decisions and measures that reason dictates. Indeed, most teenage boys notice that inclination as soon as they start to mix with girls. The bad news for Helen Lewis is that the repeal of women’s suffrage is logically necessary to avert our democratic society’s collapse. The bad news for men is that the will seems no longer there for most men to take that action. Incidentally, Helen Lewis, what percentage of Atlantic’s reporting staff is female?
