Feminists and weak leftist governments destroyed men’s spaces. What should they have expected?
Category Archives: Men
Blasphemy – mindless and moronic
You hear it everywhere, all through the media, movies, television programs, and public events: ‘Jesus!’ ‘Christ!’, but mostly ‘Jesus Christ!’ These exclamations mostly express surprise and disgust. A particularly egregious example is a pinched-face woman on the top-rated program GOGGLE BOX, who constantly expresses her disgust for her husband, among other things, by crying ‘Jesus Christ!’.
But the gratuitous declaration of ‘Jesus Christ!’ by a well-known presenter at the Logies Awards struck me as truly mindless and moronic. As stillness descended on the audience, I felt the presenter had embarrassed them.
Jesus Christ is the founder of Christianity, which is the foundation of Western Civilisation. Law, education, hospitals, charitable institutions, and much more flowed from that foundation. So what’s the connection between the name of Christianity’s founder and exclamations of surprise and disgust? None, in fact. It’s just mindless and moronic.
A second point, meaning nothing to a certain class, is that such exclamations are blasphemy, which is deeply offensive to Christians, of whom there are still many in Australian society. A self-declared tolerant society should not offend a large proportion of its fellow citizens. They know that other religions established in Australia would not tolerate such offence. I’m thinking of one in particular. So lazy sprayers of Christian blasphemy display gutlessness in addition to offence.
Useless political dilettante Monique Ryan
What’s wrong with the men in the Kooyong Electorate, where Monique Ryan is the federal member? How could they vote for this feminist, man-hating, fake politician? Don’t they realise that in voting for Ryan, they’re voting against themselves?
As Avi Yemini points out in the video below, Ryan is no different from the Greens with their poisonous, feminist, far-left platform. People shouldn’t forget her ridiculous husband running around removing opponents’ political signs prior to Election Day, an indication of their dilettante mentality.
Ryan is one person men should work to get rid of at the next federal election. She is a paradigm example of Helen Andrews’ thesis on the Great Feminisation.
The horror of the Lindsay Clancy case
Is society to be governed by reason or emotion?
Woke women again wreak ruin
This is just another case of highly-placed woke women crashing an enterprise by following their disaster-proven ideology. When will men in the corporate world grow a backbone and do the rationally obvious. It’s also another case that proves Helen Andrews’ thesis about the Great Feminisation to be spot on.
The Code of Chivalry
The Code of Chivalry was a moral and social framework guiding medieval knights, emphasizing honor, loyalty, bravery, courtesy, and the protection of the weak.
Origins and Historical Context
The Code of Chivalry emerged between the 11th and 12th centuries, blending Germanic warrior traditions with Christian ethics and feudal obligations. It transformed the rough warrior ethos of early medieval Europe into a system rooted in faith, justice, and moral restraint, guiding knights not only in battle but also in their social and spiritual lives. The Church played a key role, encouraging knights to defend Christianity, protect the defenseless, and exercise self-discipline.
Core Virtues and Principles
The Code of Chivalry emphasized several key virtues:
- Honor and Loyalty: Knights were expected to remain faithful to their lord, uphold oaths, and maintain personal integrity.
- Bravery and Courage: Valor in battle was essential, but courage also included perseverance, discipline, and readiness to face danger.
- Protection of the Weak: Knights had a duty to defend non-combatants, widows, pilgrims, and those unable to protect themselves.
- Courtesy and Courtly Behavior: Politeness, respect toward women, and refined conduct distinguished knights from ordinary warriors.
- Religious Devotion: Knights were expected to serve the Church and uphold Christian values, particularly during the Crusades.
- Generosity and Justice: Fairness, mercy, and the ethical treatment of others were central to the knightly ideal
Lindsay Clancy – Feminist psychosis
Ave Christe Rex
Will this tip men over the edge?
Lindsay Clancy hysteria
No, We Are Not All Lindsay Clancy
Some of us feel more like Patrick: helpless in the presence of unstable women
Janice Fiamengo, Sep 04, 2026
The only thing more striking than the adulation that has erupted in response to Lindsay Clancy’s admitted killing of her three children has been the torrent of anger and suspicion poured out against then-husband Patrick Clancy.
I can’t think of a single example, recent or historical, in which a bereaved mother, her children dead at her ex-husband’s hand, has been subject to anything other than profound sympathy.
It’s not uncommon for such mothers to become revered public figures, campaigning for changes in law or public opinion, and applauded for their “courage” in picking up the pieces of their lives.
One such is Claire Throssell, a British mother whose ex-husband killed their two sons and himself in 2014 by setting their house afire. No one has publicly speculated that Throssell drove her ex-husband to the deed. No one alleged that police should have more closely investigated her actions on the days leading up to the crime.
Throssell, in fact, was centrally involved in a successful feminist campaign to rewrite UK custody law in order to change the presumption that it is generally good for children to have contact with both parents after divorce. The new legislation, not yet formalized, will mean that even fewer divorced fathers will be able to maintain close contact with their children.