DEI – the gigantic screwing of men

Bettina Arndt’s article below starts off with the high-earning lollipop ladies, but its central theme is the gigantic screwing of men through DEI policy. Feminists have achieved that degree of power that they can blackmail and bully companies into accepting quotas of females merely because they are female. This is an irrational policy that weakens Australia, especially its business sector, which relies on employing the best people for the job.

If Pauline Hanson undertakes to destroy DEI policy with its weakening of Australia’s businesses, she’ll have the votes of the majority of Australians, particularly men.

*****

The Lollipop Ladies

– The women we love to hate.

Bettina Arndt, Mar 20, 2026

It’s easy to see why Melbourne’s Swinburne University promoted Aimee Stanton as one of their “pioneers for women.” She’s blond, lively, attractive and she’s a “celebrity”, having been a contestant on Australian Survivor and a presenter on a Channel 7 television program.

Most important of all, she’s a qualified female plumber – a very rare breed indeed. No wonder Swinburne couldn’t resist including her in many media stories, including their Stories for a Brighter Tomorrow promotion, with a whole page dedicated to this Swinburne alum who “survived and thrived as a lady tradie”.

The university was obviously very happy to overlook Ms Stanton’s blemishes. Minor defects like being a self-confessed perpetrator of sexual assault.

Read the rest here . . .

Feminists – man-hatred and irrationality

Another powerful article by Janice Fiamengo, flaying feminists for their bigotry, man-hatred, and irrationality.

*****

The Feminists Who Hate MAGA More than They Hate the Mullahs

A movement in thrall to anti-western animus

Janice Fiamengo, Mar 13, 2026

Here are all the parts of the Constitution Trump's Muslim ban violates.

Some commentators have expressed disappointment at the relative silence of feminists on the situation of Iranian women. “Isn’t feminism supposed to be about women’s liberation?” asked Iranian-born Sheila Nazarian, a Beverly Hills doctor and media personality.

Nazarian expressed shock that “with Iran, a country where women are governed by absolutist religious law that hardly treats them as human, so many Western feminists either maintain their silence or end up supporting the regime.”

Annabel Denham, columnist and senior political commentator at The Telegraph, recently expressed similar astonishment, asking “Where is the support for [Iranian women’s] glorious defiance? The Instagram carousels, the breathless declarations of ‘solidarity’ from former Harry Potter stars and pouting influencers?”

Others have noted the lack of outcry by feminist athletes, including the normally-vociferous Megan Rapinoe, over the request for asylum by members of the Iranian women’s soccer team.

Read the rest HERE

Blame of the manosphere

This short video takes a humorous look at the current panic among feminists and the media over what they call the manosphere. In reality, the manosphere is one of the places where their false narratives are being exposed. What we are seeing now is the creation of a straw man—something to blame, distort, and use as a distraction from the truth that is coming to light. More and more people are waking up to the game and beginning to see the hostility and self-interest that have been there all along.

Social constructivism is manifestly garbage

It’s just on a year since the sensational psychological crime drama ADOLESENCE appeared on television. Feminists were thrilled with it. Men generally were appalled. It’s informative to revisit Echo Chamberlain’s YouTube analysis.

‘Social constructivists believe that gender is socially constructed. There are no real distinct male proclivities. Therefore, all characteristics of gender difference are really just boys abiding by a societal script they feel they have to perform and which inhibits them from becoming their real, authentically sensitive selves.

‘The thing is, social constructivism is garbage, one of the most toxic ideologies of our time and its disoriented conceptions of gender are almost entirely on the male side.

‘It’s been shown scholastically to be garbage because the Scandinavian countries pushed social constructivist ideas to their fullest extent, and what happened was that the difference between the genders was actually maximised, the exact opposite of what the social constructivists envisaged and wanted.’

Echo Chamberlain