Self-righteous emotionalism – the judiciary under threat

The Lindsay Clancy Case Shows Why Civilization Must Reject Feminine “Ethics”

The jury system cannot survive moral illogic and the refusal of objectivity

Janice Fiamengo, Sep 26, 2026

It’s difficult to assess the prevalence of the Clancy phenomenon, in which a female-dominated consensus, sentimental and vicious, formed swiftly around the alleged suffering and humanity of a woman who killed her three children in a premeditated act.

A YouGov poll from early in September showed that the difference between men’s and women’s reactions to the trial was not as stark as one might have expected from the public furor (women were more likely by about 10 points to support a verdict of not guilty).

But it’s fair to say that the thousands of women—and a few men—expressing impassioned identification with Clancy represent at least a troubling minority whose voices are dangerously amplified in our public culture. Their self-righteous emotionalism corrodes the priority of reason in public life, especially the commitment to equality before the law.

The centering of women’s suffering has a long history. Here, I focus on one relatively little known, but powerful, influence that highlights the connection between feminist rationalizations of abortion and Clancy supporters’ tacit acceptance of child-murder.

Read the rest HERE . . .

Feminism is a hateful, dangerous ideology


‘Feminism is a Hateful & Dangerous Ideology that is Destroying the West. Janice Fiamengo‘

Feminism is in an unending war against men, families and civilisation. It is undermining our society, destroying relationships between men and women, making both males and females unhappy – and it is destroying our institutions.

So says Prof. Janice Fiamengo, a retired professor from the University of Ottawa, a former feminist and the author of the new book “The Goddess That Failed: Feminism’s Unending War Against Men, Families and Civilization Itself”.

Civil War in Australia?

Professor Betz answers where a civil war is likely to break out. Australia is mentioned. This is critical information, particularly for men, because men will be the ones doing the fighting, not women. The recent riots in France, especially in Paris, showed the violence was carried out almost entirely by men and checked by men. Civil violence will show how weak and unreliable females are. Few will have missed the poor woke woman pleading with the mostly black male rioters to spare her store HERE.

Men are simply guilty – no discussion

Television personality Marc Fennell is running a series on SBS about the manosphere. It’s the usual superficial, biased stuff about how figures like Andrew Tate influence young men. To most men, types like Andrew Tate are shallow, contemptible males who would only influence a minority of weak-minded, dependent boys who lack the guidance of the right men.

Most men are concerned about the destructive bias against males across all sectors of society, a state brought about by the success of the Great Feminisation, as Helen Andrews has outlined. This is where the substantial dialogue is.

Many boys are hearing the complaints of their male seniors, as well as that of mothers, sisters, and girlfriends who are appalled at the vicious treatment of their men. It’s no use telling a son or a daughter who love their father that he is essentially vicious.

Foremost among feminism’s critics is Janice Fiamengo, who appears here alongside like-minded colleagues. This is a compelling discussion.

Blasphemy – mindless and moronic

You hear it everywhere, all through the media, movies, television programs, and public events: ‘Jesus!’ ‘Christ!’, but mostly ‘Jesus Christ!’ These exclamations mostly express surprise and disgust. A particularly egregious example is a pinched-face woman on the top-rated program GOGGLE BOX, who constantly expresses her disgust for her husband, among other things, by crying ‘Jesus Christ!’.

But the gratuitous declaration of ‘Jesus Christ!’ by a well-known presenter at the Logies Awards struck me as truly mindless and moronic. As stillness descended on the audience, I felt the presenter had embarrassed them.

Jesus Christ is the founder of Christianity, which is the foundation of Western Civilisation. Law, education, hospitals, charitable institutions, and much more flowed from that foundation. So what’s the connection between the name of Christianity’s founder and exclamations of surprise and disgust? None, in fact. It’s just mindless and moronic.

A second point, meaning nothing to a certain class, is that such exclamations are blasphemy, which is deeply offensive to Christians, of whom there are still many in Australian society. A self-declared tolerant society should not offend a large proportion of its fellow citizens. They know that other religions established in Australia would not tolerate such offence. I’m thinking of one in particular. So lazy sprayers of Christian blasphemy display gutlessness in addition to offence.

Useless political dilettante Monique Ryan

What’s wrong with the men in the Kooyong Electorate, where Monique Ryan is the federal member? How could they vote for this feminist, man-hating, fake politician? Don’t they realise that in voting for Ryan, they’re voting against themselves?

As Avi Yemini points out in the video below, Ryan is no different from the Greens with their poisonous, feminist, far-left platform. People shouldn’t forget her ridiculous husband running around removing opponents’ political signs prior to Election Day, an indication of their dilettante mentality.

Ryan is one person men should work to get rid of at the next federal election. She is a paradigm example of Helen Andrews’ thesis on the Great Feminisation.