Why would men bother with the contempt and persecution?

No wonder men are opting out

– They are dropping out of work and marriage because the women aren’t worth it.

Bettina Arndt, May 15, 2026

The warning signs have been there for decades. Back in 1983, American author Barbara Ehrenreich wrote a powerful book — The Hearts of Men: American Dreams and the Flight from Commitment — arguing that a male revolt was underway. Since the 1950s, she suggested, men had begun rebelling against the breadwinner ethic – inspired by Playboy culture, the counterculture, and a desire for personal freedom. They were rejecting the cultural ideology that had shamed them into tying the knot and becoming a good provider, lest they be seen as immature, irresponsible, and less than a real man.

Ehrenreich understood that marriage was the mechanism by which society harnessed male productivity. Remove the shame, and the yoke comes off.

Forty years on, the yoke has disappeared. In April 2026, the American male labour force participation rate hit its lowest level since records began in the 1940s, according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. One in three American men — roughly 33% — were not working or actively looking for work. The overall male participation rate for men aged 16 and over stood at just 67%, down from 73.5% two decades ago and from 87% in the postwar years when Ehrenreich’s story begins.

The trend is not confined to America. Australian men’s workforce participation has fallen from around 79% in 1978 to approximately 71% today (see below), while similar declines — though less dramatic than in the United States — have occurred in the UK and Canada.

Read the rest HERE . . .

It’s a total farce – a confidence trick

Most of those calling themselves, or being called, Indigenous, First Nations (the preferred term because of its connotations), and less often Aboriginal, have demonstrably had the same upbringing, education, and in the same social environment as most Australians.

Their behaviour, speech and educational level give them away as belonging to the mass of the Australian population with the same social gradations. There are poor, white, uneducated people, as there are poor, uneducated people with Aboriginal ancestry, a great many of them indistinguishable in appearance from Australians with British and European backgrounds.

This is less a case of race relations than it is of the usurpation of power by one particular body, party, club – call it what you will – in Australia. And it’s hurried along at great speed by the Marxists in the ABC and SBS, the great apologists for all things woke, but in particular for the First Nations coup.

$1.48 million for fishing in the very best modern diving equipment? Nice work if you can get it – as the song goes.

Tell Pauline Hanson you’ll vote for One Nation if she and her party undertake to get rid of farces like this.

An Alternative description of The Counterculture Goddess

This description was sent to me by someone offering author services. I suspect it is AI-generated. It is very good – spot on.

The Counterculture Goddess is a layered, character-driven historical novel set against the cultural and spiritual upheaval of 1960s Europe, where shifting beliefs, personal rivalries, and political tensions collide inside a rapidly transforming society.

Through Anneke and Nienke’s intertwined relationships, the story explores love, jealousy, ideology, and identity within the broader backdrop of post–Second Vatican Council Europe and the rise of countercultural and spiritual movements. The result is a narrative that blends personal drama with historical and philosophical transformation in a very textured way.

As part of an ongoing Sixties Series, the book also benefits from a larger narrative framework that tracks the transition from postwar innocence into cultural revolution and moral disruption across multiple interconnected stories.

With 5 books in the series already established, there is clear long-form storytelling momentum here, but also a natural challenge many multi-book historical series face — sustained discoverability between releases and consistent visibility across evolving story arcs.

It’s now the dangers of ‘masculinism’

I made this comment on the video below:

Helen Lewis knows how to articulate her point of view and, mercifully, she did not indulge in a feminist rant to highlight the dangers of ‘masculinism’ – typically the sort of coloured word the left spin to support their leftist views. She gives an interesting update or ‘state of the nation’ address on men and masculinity, a lot of it very true from my masculine perspective. But what she also does, as most feminist commentators do, is focus on the extreme elements and personalities in the rising fightback by men against an out-of-control feminism.

Feminists don’t know where to stop. Women are now in the majority of university enrolments, and in such professions as the law and medicine. Feminists have no trouble in accepting their favoured positions while going in boots and all in areas which men are naturally attracted to – the STEM field. They are blase about formulating strategies to favour women and discriminate against men by enforced quotas.

These are issues raised by Helen Andrews and Janice Fiamengo. Ms Lewis has ignored them and their objections. It is a logical conclusion that if women refuse to have children, the society, even the nation, in which they live will break down.

According to Janice Fiamengo, the evidence shows that women destroy civilisations because their decisions are driven by emotion. They are not able to take the decisions and measures that reason dictates. Indeed, most teenage boys notice that inclination as soon as they start to mix with girls. The bad news for Helen Lewis is that the repeal of women’s suffrage is logically necessary to avert our democratic society’s collapse. The bad news for men is that the will seems no longer there for most men to take that action. Incidentally, Helen Lewis, what percentage of Atlantic’s reporting staff is female?

A grotesque man demonstrates our judicial insanity

Tell Pauline Hanson that you will vote for One Nation if she and her party reform the Human Rights Commission (sack the people there) and repeal the legislation that allows men to indiscriminately invade women’s spaces – including toilets, locker rooms and bathrooms.

Australia’s dominant political class needs to have huge doses of electric shock therapy.

Special War Crimes Tribunal for Russia

In this case, Australia has done the right thing. Putin and his mafia gang have to answer for their barbarism.

Embassy of Ukraine in Australia and New Zealand

Australia has joined the growing international effort to establish the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine as an Associate Member of the Enlarged Partial Agreement.

On 16 May in Chișinău, during the Council of Europe Ministerial Session, the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe adopted a decision approving the Enlarged Partial Agreement on the establishment of the Management Committee of the Special Tribunal – one of the key elements of its institutional architecture.

The adoption of this decision became possible thanks to notifications of intent to join the Agreement submitted by 34 Council of Europe member states, the European Union, Costa Rica, and Australia.

Foreign Minister of Ukraine Andrii Sybiha described the decision as another important step toward the practical launch of the international accountability mechanism for the crime of aggression against Ukraine.

“We are consistently moving toward the full-fledged launch of the Special Tribunal. This is yet another signal that the international community is determined to ensure the inevitability of accountability for the crime of aggression,” the Minister stressed.

The Enlarged Partial Agreement remains open not only to Council of Europe member states, but also to third countries, creating further opportunities to broaden global support for the Special Tribunal.

We highly appreciate Australia’s principled support for international law, justice, and accountability.

No alternative text description for this image

Four stages of ideological subversion

Former KGB operative Yuri Bezmenov tried to warn the West about communist subversion. After his defection, he spent his time outlining the four stages of Marxist subversion. It happened as he predicted, especially in Australia, where the Marxists have infiltrated and poisoned all the major organs of the nation.

SUBVERSION IN FOUR STAGES

1. Foster cultural decadence and demoralisation
– Attack family, history of white people, encourage sexual promiscuity and drugs, attack patriotism, undermine people’s pride in their country.

2. Create social chaos
Everyone is equal. There’s no difference between man and woman, different races and people. Unequal outcomes are the result of white prejudice, bigotry and injustice.
– Communists plan to use minorities to undermine white society.
– Manipulate the movement for civil rights as a tactic to destabilise white society. Brand anyone objecting as a racist.
– Destabilise with rampant mass immigration. The push for Third World immigration came directly from the communists.
– Encourage black people to see all inequalities and disadvantages as a result of white oppression.

3. Instigate a crisis that leads either to civil war, revolution, or invasion.

4. Launch a quick savage coup to bring the country under the control of the communist party to bring ‘normalisation’. Communists and Islamists are most successful in mounting a coup.

Madman Leon Trotsky invented and spread the word ‘racism’ because he knew that multiracial societies result in social chaos.

Use DIVERSITY as a tactic. Diversity undermines a coherent, cohesive society. Diversity is the major weapon against white societies.

Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmenov, also known as Tomas David Schuman, was a Soviet journalist, KGB-associated informant, and defector who worked for the Novosti Press Agency before fleeing while stationed in India in 1970. Resettled in Canada, he became an outspoken anti-communist author and lecturer, best known for exposing the KGB’s “ideological subversion” strategy—demoralization, destabilization, crisis, and normalization—outlined in his 1980s books and lectures until his death in 1993.

Migrant enclaves changing the character of Australia

Freya Leach, for John Anderson Media, gives an excellent presentation below. We need more of it. In several softly probing interviews, she shows how aggressive Islam is. It’s the same throughout the West. The core authority of Muslim communities dictates their policy goals, which are fundamentally to enforce all aspects of Islamic culture.

It’s interesting to hear one interviewed student say that Australia is a monoculture, meaning migrants form cultural enclaves so that we’re not a multicultural country of different people with different cultural backgrounds, but one of monocultural tribes. He gave the example of Chatswood.

My father’s family settled in Chatswood from the country. They were pioneering people. I went to school in Chatswood. We had friends in Chatswood, and so on. It is now an Asian enclave, hardly recognisable as the suburb it once was. You’ll meet people there behind shop counters who barely speak English. The equivalent in Melbourne is Box Hill, also an Asian enclave. Box Hill shopping centre is like another country – an Asian country.

Many migrant cultures don’t mix. And they don’t want to. It’s obvious. The migrants who blend best with the Australian population are from the UK and other European countries. If you look at the migration figures of the last twenty years, you’ll find a sharp switch from the UK and Europe to Asia and the Middle East, especially to migrants from India and China. Migration has changed, and continues to change, the character of Australia. It’ll soon be more than Auburn where an ordinary Australian will feel out of place.

Is it racist to want your country to maintain its character and foundational principles? If so, then all countries with any pride at all are racist – particularly India, China, and that whole worming batch of Middle Eastern countries, who would not for one moment tolerate a suburb of white Australians in their midst.

The Greens, TEALs, and Labor are very selective in their accusations of racism – as are their propagandist mouthpieces, the ABC and SBS.

White bad. All the rest good.

Tell Pauline Hanson you’ll vote for One Nation if she and her party readjust the migrant intake, both as regards numbers and cultures.

The Great Aboriginal history con

Timeless History Invented Yesterday

Robert Hill, Quadrant, May 18 2026

I have never read the “First Knowledges” box set and, after a decade spent immersed in this field, probably never will. That is not intellectual laziness. It is recognition of a relentless and deceitful genre. The first box set of six books was released in 2023 and in June this year we are told we will be privileged to have a box set of 10 books for $195.

This article is not a review of the 10 books but rather a consideration of a cultural moment: one in which Aboriginal Australia has been steadily transformed from a small-scale hunter-gatherer society into a profound ‘civilisation’ of extraordinary sophistication retrospectively credited with astronomy, engineering, politics, mathematics, economics, architecture, agriculture and environmental science in forms supposedly hidden from every serious observer until the present age.

The boxed set represents perhaps the most elaborate construction yet assembled within this broader movement of institutional mythmaking, one in which historical restraint has steadily collapsed and the ordinary boundaries between evidence, speculation, and fantasy have become increasingly blurred. Yet given the continuing incentives within universities, publishing, government institutions, and ARC-funded research to reward ever more expansive reinterpretation, it is entirely possible that further cards remain to be added to the structure.

Read the rest HERE . . .