This is an excellent short commentary by Celina on the perils of a migration policy that ignores cultural differences. I recommend Celina’s Substack and YouTube accounts.
Author Archives: admin
A weapon in the reinvented white Aboriginal coup
The ABC, SBS and the Guardian (newspaper for the slow-learner left) have been endlessly milking the Kumanjayi Walker shooting. No regard for the facts when a supremely important political action is underway. Forget about truth and justice. The anti-white SBS is presently running a four-part television series to incite hatred against Australia’s white population. There’s no need to watch it; the message has been thrashed to death in previous reports. Daily Insight has provided another devastating comment on this ongoing affair.
This is an act of war.
All around Australia, historic monuments are being vandalised or destroyed. We know who does it: the cowardly Marxists who collude with reinvented white Aboriginal and Islamic activists. The responsible authorities in the elite class are either too weak to act or aligned with the cause.
Far right on the brain
Despite the violence in the West overwhelmingly coming from Muslims and the hard left, the media instruments open up their reporting on the violence by stating explicitly or alluding to the ‘far right.’ They can’t help themselves. They’re so used to distorting and lying about the people they see as the far right (meaning anyone of a conservative leaning) that their Pavlovian reaction is to shout ‘far right,’ ‘far right,’ at the slightest disturbance. You can expect such a reaction from the government-funded ABC and SBS, the Guardian (politics for the slow-learner left), and the Nine newspapers, The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald.
So was the case in Poland with the shooting murder of random pedestrians on one of Poland’s main squares. The shout was immediate: far right! Alas, it turned out to be a lunatic of the far left. Of course, the indignant reporting died down pretty quickly.
The Great Betrayal
It’s war by lawfare. The nation of Australia, founded by the Anglo-Celtic settlers on 26 January 1788, is under attack by its elite class, who are hell-bent on giving it away to a bunch of fake Aboriginals. This is all the result of the Native Title Act, forced on us by that bastard Paul Keating. It’s time to repeal that treasonous act. Read Robert Hill’s article carefully. This state of affairs has been long predictable.
The elites are playing with fire.
Naarm Rising, Part I: The Claim on Melbourne
Robert Hill, Quadrant, Nov 05 2026
On October 30, 2026, law firm Ashurst Perkins Coie delivered a blunt warning about Melbourne’s native title claim: public land inside the claim area can no longer be dealt with as though native title were irrelevant. The registered claim already triggers procedural consequences under the Native Title Act, and governments, developers and land users are being told to protect their position now. If native title is ultimately recognised, affected public land will carry an additional enforceable legal interest that future dealings must accommodate.
In plain English: Melbourne public land now carries a potential native title encumbrance. Ignore it at your peril.
Melbourne is presently heading down a Native Title consent path. At the Federal Court case-management hearing on July 28, 2026, the claimants indicated that they were pursuing a consent determination or agreement with the Victorian and Commonwealth governments. That means the historical foundations of these claimed rights may never be tested through a fully contested trial.
Then comes the political significance. Ashurst expressly points to the Victorian election on November 28, 2026, and tells affected parties to watch for any change in the government’s approach to settling native title claims. It says the election may shape the outcome and notes that the Coalition has committed to dismantling significant elements of Victoria’s existing Treaty framework, an attitude Ashurst says may affect its approach to native-title settlements.
Self-righteous emotionalism – the judiciary under threat
The Lindsay Clancy Case Shows Why Civilization Must Reject Feminine “Ethics”
The jury system cannot survive moral illogic and the refusal of objectivity
Janice Fiamengo, Sep 26, 2026
It’s difficult to assess the prevalence of the Clancy phenomenon, in which a female-dominated consensus, sentimental and vicious, formed swiftly around the alleged suffering and humanity of a woman who killed her three children in a premeditated act.
A YouGov poll from early in September showed that the difference between men’s and women’s reactions to the trial was not as stark as one might have expected from the public furor (women were more likely by about 10 points to support a verdict of not guilty).
But it’s fair to say that the thousands of women—and a few men—expressing impassioned identification with Clancy represent at least a troubling minority whose voices are dangerously amplified in our public culture. Their self-righteous emotionalism corrodes the priority of reason in public life, especially the commitment to equality before the law.
The centering of women’s suffering has a long history. Here, I focus on one relatively little known, but powerful, influence that highlights the connection between feminist rationalizations of abortion and Clancy supporters’ tacit acceptance of child-murder.
An update on the state of book publishing
The book publishing industry has undergone enormous change over the last twenty years and breathless change over the last five years. The relationship between traditional publishers and Indie publishing is constantly shifting. Traditional publishers are now looking at the bestsellers in the Indie market. Lara Helmling provides an excellent overview.
Edmund Burke Book

Here is the first chapter in my proposed book, EDMUND BURKE: THOUGHTS AND NOTES
Chapter 1 –The Life, Thought, and Times of Edmund Burke: A Commentary
Australia’s changing population – changing the face of the nation
Australia’s population by country of birth
Statistics on Australia’s estimated resident population by country of birth
Reference period: Jun 2025, Australian Bureau of Statistics.
Key statistics
- At 30 June 2025, Australia’s population included 8.8 million people who were born overseas.
- The proportion of Australia’s population born outside Australia was 32.0%.
- India, England, China, and New Zealand were the countries of birth with the largest populations.
- Those born in India recorded the largest increase since 2015.
Australia’s population by country of birth
As at 30 June 2025, Australia’s estimated resident population was 27.6 million people, comprising 18.8 million people born in Australia and 8.8 million people born overseas.
- Australia’s overseas-born population increased by 258,000 people in 2024-25.
- The proportion of overseas-born increased to 32.0% in 2025, up from 31.5% in 2024.
Immigration – the power of ethnic voting blocks
Pauline Hanson has been media-bashed endlessly over her 1996 claim that Australia was ‘in danger of being swamped by Asians.’ Why has she been unmercifully media-bashed? Because the claim was untrue, or because Australia’s elite woke class forbade such claims, regardless of their truth?
The Australian Bureau of Statistics released 2025 figures showing the Chinese population approaching 800,000 and the Indian population 1,000,000. At what point would you use ‘swamped’? Well, really, we know it’s a case of the elite class suppressing information they don’t like. Foremost members of Australia’s elite controlling class are the propagandist instruments ABC and SBS, who smash anything they deem racist.
The Australian people have a chance to do something about migration in the 2025 Victorian State Election and in the Federal Election of 2028. It’s not numbers; it’s who is compatible with Australia’s culture, who is prepared to fit in, and not establish enclaves to create their own cultural hegemony. Indeed, we need to focus on people directly related to Australia’s original population to balance the skewing of immigration numbers over the last ten years.
‘Australians with ancestry going back to the 1800s to mid-1900s will ignore this video at their peril. Ethnic voting blocks are already happening. Suburbs in Sydney established in the 1800s and early 1900s by Australian and British settlers are now 90% Asian. The Chinese community voted against the Morrison government because of its vigorous resistance to the bullying of communist China. The loss of the Morrison government has been attributed to the critical shifting of the Chinese vote to the Labor Party. Australia must review its immigration policy before it’s too late.’