The Islamic invasion continues while the West masturbates

Here’s another Muslim embedded in the West gloating over the success of the Islamic invasion. Click HERE.

It’s not idle, empty boasting of the increasing footprint and foothold of Islam in the West. It’s reflected in the West’s own figures, and it’s observable.

It is already known, particularly within the Labor Party, that the Islamic colony in Australia already exerts critical influence and power in the political process. The number of Muslims in Australia’s parliaments is increasing. There are whole areas in the suburbs of the major cities that are majority Muslim. The Lakemba district in inner Sydney is, according to the boast above, already 90 per cent Muslim.

Our leaders are betraying us. They are ultimately inviting civil strife. Do they think the descendants of the people who built Australia will sit back indefinitely and take it?

Channel 9 – You’re pathetic

Snotnose Robert Irwin, compering the Logies awards, directed a scripted comment against Karl Stefanovich, recently fired by Channel 9. He said that although Karl was not present, they had reserved a seat for him on the right of the room – the far right.

Get it? The far right? You know, he interviewed super far-right agitator Tommy Robinson on his podcast.

Hah, hah, hah, ho, ho, ho – very subtle, very nuanced.

You Channel 9 people are pathetic. There’s a good reason why I stopped watching 60 Minutes, ACA, and the Today Show years ago. Long gone are the halcyon days when Channel 9 headed the ratings, especially with their family programs.

Questions missing from the census

While completing my online census questions last night, I realised four vital questions were missing:

Are you a full-blooded Aboriginal, living the traditional life of the Aboriginal in all its primitiveness, without recourse to any support from modern Australian society? YES/NO

Are you a full-blooded Aboriginal taking advantage of all that modern Australia has to offer? YES/NO

Are you a reinvented white-Aboriginal, predominantly of European ancestry, having no connection whatever with the traditional life of the full-blooded Aboriginal? YES/NO

Are you a reinvented white-Aboriginal, indistinguishable from your fellow Australian of Anglo-Celtic origin? YES/NO

What’s wrong with Anthony Albanese?

The whole of Australia was embarrassed by the prime minister’s grovelling obsequiousness in Sydney’s Lakemba Mosque, apparently to reassure Muslims in Australia after two fanatics of the mosque’s congregation gunned down fifteen Australians in cold blood. He followed that with a $60 million grant to Muslim organisations to help Australians overcome their Islamophobia, another recently created shut-up word.

He followed that with a declaration that he would prefer shagging Kyle Minogue over two other choices. But the doozy was his making fun of the gift the Japanese prime minister gave him during her recent visit. It was a melon that has cultural significance for the Japanese. Naturally, the Japanese were comprehensively pissed off at this airy insult and have broken their cultural reticence and politeness to say so.

It appears that Albanese doesn’t listen to anything outside his narrow range of thought.

ABC vile propagandist

You would think that the ABC, premier feminist propagandist for all things woke, would have a little more self-awareness. Did the sisterhood really not expect the short film about Gina Rinehart to sicken the majority of the population?

The best way to deal with Australia’s government-funded billion-dollar propagandist is to break it up – not defund it. Tell Pauline and her One Nation members you’ll vote for them if she takes steps immediately after the 2028 federal election to break up the Corporation and get rid of the rotting parts.

The dreamtime enters history

The ideological concoction of history

*****

Pemulwuy: Coward, Thief, Killer

Robert Hill, Quadrant, Aug 07 2026

No Aboriginal figure has acquired greater symbolic importance in the modern construction of the “Frontier Wars” than Pemulwuy, and no episode associated with him has been more heavily mythologised than the confrontation now called the “Battle of Parramatta” in 1797. The elevation of a brief, unattributed colonial account into a major military engagement has supplied the emerging frontier-war narrative with both a commanding hero and a foundational battle.

The modern Pemulwuy is not merely the product of generous interpretation. He has been constructed through the cumulative enlargement of fragmentary, unattributed and often much later accounts. Hearsay became fact. Raiding became warfare. A clash became a battle. A notorious local outlaw became the commander of a resistance movement.

A short article cannot examine every contradiction and embellishment within that transformation. It can, however, expose its essential structure. The contemporary evidence does not securely establish Pemulwuy as the commander of an Aboriginal army, the leader of a regional political coalition or the architect of a sustained military campaign. Even the killing most strongly associated with him rests upon an identification that is plausible rather than conclusive.

Read the rest HERE . . .

The solution: repeal the Native Title Act

What Mabo has Wrought

Peter O’Brien, Quadrant , Aug 04 2026

In my latest book, Juukan – the New Dark Emu (order it here), I postulate that, in the wake of the ludicrous findings of the Parliamentary Enquiry into the legal demolition by Rio Tinto of two nondescript rock shelters , protection of Aboriginal heritage will become an increasingly intolerable burden for mining companies to bear.  A recent judgment by the Federal Court against Fortescue Mining Group bears that out. What follows is an extract from my book and some observations about the latest developments.

____________

In its submission to the Juukan Parliamentary Enquiry, Fortescue (FMG) describes itself as a “proud” Western Australian company, no doubt to establish right off that they have been listening to, and learning from, their “native title partners”.

FMG has seven agreements with different native title holders, and they note:

Among other things, the Native Title Agreements facilitate the identification and protection of significant Aboriginal cultural heritage through Aboriginal Cultural heritage surveys. As a result of these surveys, Fortescue and native title holders have surveyed 2.5 million km2 of land and identified and protected over 5900 cultural heritage places. Fortescue submits that this extensive protection is evidence that the State cultural heritage protection regime is largely successful.

Not a great start, I would have thought, for FMG to claim that it had surveyed 2.5 million square kilometres, in other words pretty much the whole of Western Australia. Makes you wonder if the figure of 5900 protected sites is also an order of magnitude out.

Read the rest HERE . . .

Bondi, Mr Albanese, Bondi

The empirical evidence of Islamic terrorism and what happens when Islamic migration is allowed into a Western country is overwhelming.

The truth, however, for the left is of no concern; ideological hegemony is. Ideological power goes before all else, even before the integrity of one’s culture and the safety of its citizens.

Prime Minister Albanese and his government are betraying Australia and its people on all fronts.

The Desecration of the Australian War Memorial

The Capture by Stealth of the AWM

Robert Hill, Quadrant, 20 July 2026

“A major feature on Frontier Wars will piss off the majority of Australia’s 600,000 veterans.” So warned Major General Greg Melick in 2022, when he was National President of the RSL and a member of the Australian War Memorial Council.

“The fundamental element is that the War Memorial was built in sacred recognition of wars that Australians fought as a nation, unified against an external foe. It is not to be a memorial for conflicts within Australia,” Barnaby Joyce said in 2022.

These statements expose the question the Memorial has never honestly answered: if a major Frontier Wars display would so profoundly disturb the veterans whose service the Memorial exists to honour, why has the policy been advanced without a clear public announcement, published legal advice, or a frank explanation of how it fits within the Australian War Memorial Act?

I am not a military man. I do not claim the authority of service. But my love for this country could not be greater. I know sacrilege when I see it.

The Australian War Memorial is the last place still standing largely outside the ideological capture of our national institutions. It is where politics is meant to fall silent before the dead; where the nation goes not to be lectured, corrected or re-educated, but to remember those who served and those who died.

Yet we are living inside a national fog of exaggeration and fabrication surrounding the so-called Frontier Wars. Claims unsupported by military reality are forced upon us as settled truth, even where no war existed.

The more immediate question is how this contested project became institutional policy. It was not advanced by open argument, but by stealth: through an ideological sequence and in a vacuum of justification. No clear public mandate was sought. No legal reasoning was published. No serious explanation was offered to veterans or the wider public as to why a contested account of colonial violence belongs within the statutory war memorial.

Read the rest HERE . . .