I made this slideshow to celebrate the fortieth wedding anniversary of my older brother, Michael, and his wife, Wendy, in 2006. It was a great hit with the family at the time. It had terrific memories. But now, 20 years later, when Michael and Wendy are in their eighties, and I’m eighty next July, the slideshow has so much more significance. It now shows a way of life and its ambience that has almost disappeared. It’s still a lot of fun, but now it is tinged with nostalgia for a time in Australia that is drifting into the nation’s forgetfulness.
We were in our mid-twenties when the 1960s Revolution hit in Sydney. In this slideshow, one can see the background of the novels in my Sixties Series, especially in Books 3, 4, 5, and 6 to come.
Excellent video. It makes all the right points about Welcome to Country, land rights, invasion, and all the nonsensical claims about Australia’s history by reinvented White-Aboriginals. What do people expect when a person states, as an introduction to Anzac Day, that most of the people listening are not legitimate on the land they’re standing on?
Will we get a lot of uncles and aunties, made-up welcomes to country, religious animist smoking ceremonies, white flabby painted men dancing around waving spears and clicking sticks, nonsensical Australian history . . .?
My aversion to Islam has nothing to do with it being wrong. All religions with a deity or deities outside of Christianity (and Judaism to the extent its scripture is the foundation of Christianity) are to me without exception wrong, and those without a deity irrelevant. For the most part, as a follower of what I believe to be the only true and complete religion, I simply ignore the rest.
So, if my aversion to Islam is not based on it being wrong, or even that it has plagiarised, corrupted, and ridiculously distorted part of Christian and Jewish sources in order to build its hateful and phony scripture, on what is it based? It is based purely on its scriptural prescriptions which are directed to doing me, and my kind, harm; and on the deadly implementation of those prescriptions by its acolytes.
Over 49,000 deadly Islamic terrorist attacks since 9/11 speak to this harm, as does the barbaric treatment of Christianity and Christians in the Islamic world, as does the arrogance displayed in the Western world once Muslim populations reach numbers enough to influence elections. And its gatherings into “communities” around mosques means those numbers are not that high in the scheme of things.
A little over 3% of the population in Australia is enough to fuel endless pro-Palestinian marches, to unashamedly make life uncomfortable for the Prime Minister when visiting an Islamicised part of Sydney, and to even putting Australia at one with the anti-Israel baying mob at the UN. Imagine the future, not if, but when the percentage becomes six. You don’t have to, just look at the UK and 3,000 (all male!) bums in the air in Trafalgar Square.
Why back on February 7, 2008, the then Archbishop of Canterbury, the sopping-wet Rowan Williams, envisaged the parallel application of sharia law in the UK ( see Civil and Religious Law in England: a Religious Perspective). He was prescient. According to the Daily Mail [paywalled] up to 85 sharia courts operate in the UK. And counting, I would say.
Islam was built as a rallying cry for Arab conquests. It spreads darkness, hatred, terrorism, discrimination, and impoverishment wherever it holds sway. It is, as Churchill put it back in the day, the most retrograde force in the world; even accounting, I would add, for the dreadful legacy of communism in the 20th century:
No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step, and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it (Islam) has vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome. — The River War, 1899
Cheron Long, who calls herself Australian Black Conservative, and says she’s ‘blacker than the ace of spades,’ has a message below for the Aboriginal ‘wannabes who are whiter than Caspar the Ghost.’
I am currently seeing a wave of hate and threats directed at me from people claiming an identity that doesn’t match the reality standing in front of them. They claim to be Black yet they look whiter than a newborn baby’s bottom. These are the box tickers the ones fueling the divide in our nation and our culture. You can head back to the Senator Lidia Thorpe school of racial division because that is where you belong doing anything and everything to split Australians apart.
Understand this. I am not backing down for anyone, especially not some wannabes who are whiter than Casper the Ghost. The statistics don’t lie. The Aboriginal population is growing at a rate that biology alone cannot explain. It’s growing as fast as a pen can tick a box. This population has more than doubled in the last twenty years a surge of identity shifting that the world has never seen before on this scale.
I love this country I love our flag and I love our ANZACs. Australian culture is a sacred legacy that needs protecting. To me the truth of heritage isn’t a political tool or a trend it is the blood in my veins and the history of this soil. It is an unbroken bond to our ancestors and a commitment to the future of one united people. This truth is inclusive of all Australians who honor our shared history and stand together as one.
Go ahead call me an Uncle Tom. Call me a racist for supporting great Aussies like Pauline Hanson’s Please ExplainSenator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and Nyunggai Warren Mundine AO . I know these two ladies and him personally. I know how much they truly love this country and our shared Australian culture. Your names don’t hurt me because I know who I am. As a Black fella blacker than the ace of spades, I stand for the truth of our heritage and for the unity of one nation under one flag. Threats won’t silence me, they only prove that the truth is hitting home, and that is what fuels me to keep pushing and pushing and doing my bit to save our Country.
Reinvented White Aboriginals can call it what they want and embellish its significance for as far as their imagination stretches, but for me it is, and will stay, Ayers Rock.
We’ve seen the latest woke campaign all over the place. The campaign is to replace Australian place names with Aboriginal names, or to name any area according to the Aboriginal tribal name. Government-funded SBS is the leader of this pure-gold woke endeavour, followed closely by the government-funded ABC and – wait for it – government-owned Australia Post. Australia Post urges its customers to include the Aboriginal place or area name in all their posts.
Changing place names is an essential part of the white-Aboriginal coup that aims to have all things Aboriginal permeate the Australian culture, whose foundations are European and British Isles. Of course, such a coup would not be possible without the complicity of the treacherous dominant political class.
‘The Aboriginal Land Rights Act was a Whitlam-era ideological experiment premised on the fantasy that land transfer and autonomy would allow Aboriginal people to revert to a viable “traditional” existence inside a modern nation-state. Wadeye is the living wreckage of that idea.
‘Fifty years on, it has no real economy, no self-sufficiency, no civic order, and no credible path forward. Land has been handed over, and the result is not empowerment but stagnation, violence, and permanent dependency. Wadeye is not transitional. It is the end state of a policy that mistook symbolic restitution for governance. No government has been willing to confront or unwind the model, because any attempt at reform is immediately racialised and treated as illegitimate . . .
‘The Northern Land Council is not a marginal or impoverished body. It is one of the wealthiest statutory land councils in Australia, controlling vast territories, negotiating resource agreements worth hundreds of millions of dollars, and maintaining substantial financial reserves. It asserts authority over land use, access, and exclusion, yet disclaims any operational responsibility for safety, order, or civil peace on the land it controls.’
