George Christensen outlines the perniciousness of ideological multiculturalism. This is an excellent presentation, and I recommend subscribing to his ‘Confidential Daily’.
*****
The Multicultural Con
Canberra sold Australians multiculturalism as neighbourly tolerance, but its own blueprint reveals a far bigger project to rebuild the nation around identity, language and bureaucracy.
George Christensen, June 29 20265
Australia has spent the past week arguing about one word: “monoculture”.
Pauline Hanson said Australia should be a “monoculture”, not a multicultural society, and suddenly half the country’s public figures had something to say. Anthony Albanese had a swing. Angus Taylor chimed in. Former Governor-General Sir Peter Cosgrove weighed in. The media did what the media does, which is just to simply say that what Pauline Hanson said is wrong and pretend the argument begins and ends there. It does not.
The real question is not whether people like the word “monoculture”. The real question is whether Australia is still allowed to believe in one people, in one nation, under one flag.
That used to be normal. It was not a scandal. It was not a dog whistle. It was the basic idea of a country. People came here from all over the world, but they came to Australia. Not to an international airport lounge with suburbs attached. Not to a patchwork of separate communities, each flying its own flag, speaking past each other, and lobbying the government as permanent identity blocs.
Read the rest HERE . . .