Another demonstration of a society falling apart. Ordinary people want someone to start putting it back together. That’s why many are turning to Pauline Hanson.
Notice the disproportionate number of girls in the throng of abusive, screaming, foul-mouthed schoolkids. Many of these kids need to have their mouths washed out with soap, particularly the girls.
Channel 9 – You’re pathetic – again.
I’m sure Pauline Hanson realises that ninety percent of the media are after her. There’ll be no limits or depths to the lies, distortions, smears, sneers, and mockery One Nation and its supporters will have to endure for the foreseeable future. The irony is that the more the media attacks Pauline and One Nation, the more her supporters increase.
Senator Mehreen Faruqi comes from one of the backward sh*tholes of Asia, a country that is presently torturing one of its heroes, a man that would be a hero in any country of the West, a dashing, handsome, swash-buckling, all-round cricketer that thrilled stadiums with his cricketing feats. Regrettably, Faruqi belongs to the class of Imran Khan’s tormenters.
And she’s in Australia, abusing the people and the country that have given her a life that is light years away from the degradation most of her fellow-countrymen suffer: a salary well above the ordinary Australian battler, the means to invest and profit from her investments, and a platform from which to preach her far-left ideas and abuse the people that allowed her into their country.
Sadly, for Faruqi, despite all the benefits accrued to her by her position in Australia, she cannot change her skin which is why she constantly refers to its colour.
George Orwell in his novel 1984:
‘It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy.’
A Blood-Soaked Land: Part II
Robert Hill, Quadrant, Aug 21 2026
Cultural lethal violence was institutionalised in Aboriginal societies in a way that sustained warfare was not. Payback and retaliatory punishment could be socially sanctioned or obligatory, but there were no standing armies, permanent commands or institutions for sustained military campaigning. The deep record is therefore one of recurring lethal violence, not continuous war.
The same caution should apply to the frontier. Killing, reprisal and punitive expedition did not automatically become “war” merely because one participant was British. Yet modern revisionism increasingly reverses the categories: raid and reprisal between Aboriginal groups remain “feud” or “payback”, while analogous episodes involving the British are aggregated across decades and vast distances into “Frontier Wars”. In the process, scattered resistance is retrospectively endowed with a military coherence the underlying social organisation did not possess.
Demographically, the terminology changes nothing. A man killed in revenge is no less dead because his death is called payback rather than warfare. What matters is frequency, lethality and persistence.
Comparative anthropology reinforces the distinction. Lawrence Keeley, professor of anthropology at the University of Illinois at Chicago and author of the influential Oxford University Press study War Before Civilization, showed from archaeological and ethnographic evidence that recurring raids and relatively small clashes could impose heavy proportional losses on non-state populations. More revealing still are anthropologists Douglas Fry and Patrik Söderberg. In a peer-reviewed 2013 study published in Science, they systematically examined lethal aggression in 21 mobile forager societies drawn from the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample. Their conclusion cuts against claims of ubiquitous primitive warfare: most lethal incidents were homicide, interpersonal disputes or feud, while warfare constituted only a minority.
That does not weaken the argument. It defines it.
Read Robert Hill’s The myth of Invasion
It’s a simple arithmetic sum of subtraction: contraception, abortion, refusal to marry, childlessness, lesbianism.
Many analysts say that the CIA director’s visit to Moscow was to warn the psychopaths in the Kremlin not to embark on action too provocative to ignore. The Russian government’s hostility towards the democratic West has not subsided – indeed has never changed. We in the West are the eternal enemy. Most of us don’t realise that we are constantly trying to appease an enemy that will never be appeased. Now, the American intelligence community thinks the Kremlin’s hybrid war of subversion and infrastructure assaults threatens to escalate to military action in the Baltic states. The message to Moscow: don’t do it. That was the message to psychotic Putin before the Ukraine attack. It’s likely he’ll bare his bum to the second visit.
Towards the end of the video below is the warning to Europeans to prepare for possible disruption to critical parts of their infrastructure. Stock up for at least four days. We in Australia are not too far away to escape the disruption. We need to act resolutely. But our problem is that the country has been feminised, and thus weakened.
George Orwell in his novel 1984
‘It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy.’