This short video takes a humorous look at the current panic among feminists and the media over what they call the manosphere. In reality, the manosphere is one of the places where their false narratives are being exposed. What we are seeing now is the creation of a straw man—something to blame, distort, and use as a distraction from the truth that is coming to light. More and more people are waking up to the game and beginning to see the hostility and self-interest that have been there all along.
Once again, Harris Sultan exposes Islam’s leaders who express their determination to subject the world to their primitive, blood and thunder ideology. And there we have Prime Minister Albanese in fairyland, thinking he can bring Islam out of its dark hole by visiting their mosque, thereby subjecting the Australian nation to Islamic humiliation. Harris Sultan’s channel is highly recommended.
Australians should not make the mistake of placing the Iranian people in the same category as the Arabs of the Middle East. For a start, there’s an ethnic difference. Iranians are Persians, and those against the barbaric Ayatollah regime refer to themselves as Persians, not Iranians. They make good, effective industrious migrants.
On the other hand, the Ayatollah Iranians, those who support the world’s leading terrorist, are the worst migrants. Among the Ayatollah Iranians are many who actively support the regime by confronting and sometimes killing Persians who speak out against the regime.
These Ayatollah activists are all through the West. Just yesterday in Holland, there was a shooting of a Persian who was actively working against the Iranian barbaric government. An investigation into the killings of Persians in Holland found that the Iranian government contracted criminal groups to carry out their assassinations.
*****
Sky News
Political Activist Drew Pavlou questions why the individuals who attended the pro-Iranian regime protest in Melbourne are in this country and not in Iran. “Why are these people in our country?” Mr Drew asked Sky News host Rita Panini. “Why are they in our country if they hate democracy, if they support a foreign dictatorship. “They clearly believe in political violence. “I don’t want them to be in this country if they hate us, if they hate our democracy, if they hate our values, why are they here?”
‘In moral terms, progressive Anglicans have abandoned natural law for positive law. In natural law there is a concern for final causes—Aristotle’s “that for the sake of which”; a goal, purpose, or final cause guiding an action, a telos—to explain the nature and structure of reality. In positive law there is a belief that the nature and structure of reality can be legislated, established by legal precedent (and positive law has been legislating against natural law since the sexual revolution). Hence progressive Anglicans in the Global North have followed the zeitgeist in abolishing distinctions between male and female, homosexuality and heterosexuality, reproductive system and digestive tract, treating them all as functionally equivalent.’
*****
mullally III
The Archbishop of Cant
Michael Giffin, Quadrant Mar 11 2026
Given Anglicanism is the third largest Christian polity in the world behind Catholicism and Orthodoxy, many are wondering why the reception of Dame Sarah Mullally as the first female Archbishop of Canterbury has been muted. Her gender is part of the reason, of course, but even Rome did not break off ecumenical dialogue with Canterbury over women’s ordination. The deal breaker for Rome was the consecration to the historic episcopate of a practising homosexual in 2003, Gene Robinson, whose “marriage” to his “husband” in 2008 was followed by a “divorce” in 2014. In what can only be called tragic irony, ECUSA (The Episcopal Church in the United States) chose to exhaust its moral capital on the hill of feminism and homosexual rights, wilfully, with open eyes.
It’s just on a year since the sensational psychological crime drama ADOLESENCE appeared on television. Feminists were thrilled with it. Men generally were appalled. It’s informative to revisit Echo Chamberlain’s YouTube analysis.
‘Social constructivists believe that gender is socially constructed. There are no real distinct male proclivities. Therefore, all characteristics of gender difference are really just boys abiding by a societal script they feel they have to perform and which inhibits them from becoming their real, authentically sensitive selves.
‘The thing is, social constructivism is garbage, one of the most toxic ideologies of our time and its disoriented conceptions of gender are almost entirely on the male side.
‘It’s been shown scholastically to be garbage because the Scandinavian countries pushed social constructivist ideas to their fullest extent, and what happened was that the difference between the genders was actually maximised, the exact opposite of what the social constructivists envisaged and wanted.’
Warning about the radicalising of girls and young women, this informative video was made 10 months ago. It has only got worse as many of my comments demonstrate.
*****
In this video essay, Quillette founder Claire Lehmann explores the global rise in political radicalisation among young women. Drawing on recent data, psychological research, and cultural trends, she examines how ideological movements, institutions, and technology are shaping a new form of gender polarisation. Far from the simplistic narratives of empowerment or oppression, this video presents a more complex—and urgent—story about identity, agency, and modern activism
