Pauline Hanson takes Muslim Faruqi to the High Court

Dr Joanna Howe is a champion. Few Australians on the conservative side are as active in taking the battle up to the miserable, destructive left. In this video, she shows that she is supporting Pauline Hanson in her battle with the despicable Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi, whose bigoted record speaks for itself. What an ironic joke that the appeal judge found in favour of Faruqi – Hanson was racist in her reply to Faruqi’s nastiness – when it is clear that, in all her actions and speeches, Faruqi hates white Anglo people.

Let me allude to a matter here that is of great significance. Do you see it? Joanna is actually a dark woman. Her ancestry is likely Indian or Sri Lankan, or somewhere in that part of the world. Who would dispute that she’s Australian? Who, except the small band of nutters who the bigots in the media use to smear the rest of us? As Pauline says, ethnicity isn’t the point. It is the people who are unashamedly incompatible with Australian culture, people who hate Australia and Australians, who are here to grab their piece of real estate, set up their enclave and pursue the hegemony of their culture.

Man-hatred deeply embedded in the judicial system

I remark again that most men have little idea of the feminist hatred they’ll meet if ever they end up before the bench. Women, or more accurately, feminists, have possession of our legal system. That will get worse because universities are churning out more female lawyers than male lawyers. Why should that matter, the average man will ask? The law is the law.

The explanation is provided by the crucial distinction Janice Fiamengo and Helen Andrews make between female and male judgment: males judge on the basis of raw logic and truth: females judge on the basis of empathy. Helen Andrews puts it this way: females ‘value empathy over rationality; safety over risk; conformity and cohesion over competition and hierarchy.’

In her article, A Grim Verdict on Scottish Justice, Bettina Arndt gives a graphic account of the ordeal a male will likely endure if ever brought before the courts by an accusing female. All the sympathy is for the female; none whatever for the male. It is not a question of fact and rationality, but of feeling and female solidarity.

Read the article HERE . . .