Category Archives: Great Feminisation

Self-righteous emotionalism – the judiciary under threat

Posted on by
Reply

The Lindsay Clancy Case Shows Why Civilization Must Reject Feminine “Ethics”

The jury system cannot survive moral illogic and the refusal of objectivity

Janice Fiamengo, Sep 26, 2026

It’s difficult to assess the prevalence of the Clancy phenomenon, in which a female-dominated consensus, sentimental and vicious, formed swiftly around the alleged suffering and humanity of a woman who killed her three children in a premeditated act.

A YouGov poll from early in September showed that the difference between men’s and women’s reactions to the trial was not as stark as one might have expected from the public furor (women were more likely by about 10 points to support a verdict of not guilty).

But it’s fair to say that the thousands of women—and a few men—expressing impassioned identification with Clancy represent at least a troubling minority whose voices are dangerously amplified in our public culture. Their self-righteous emotionalism corrodes the priority of reason in public life, especially the commitment to equality before the law.

The centering of women’s suffering has a long history. Here, I focus on one relatively little known, but powerful, influence that highlights the connection between feminist rationalizations of abortion and Clancy supporters’ tacit acceptance of child-murder.

Read the rest HERE . . .

Pauline Hanson takes Muslim Faruqi to the High Court

Posted on by
Reply

Dr Joanna Howe is a champion. Few Australians on the conservative side are as active in taking the battle up to the miserable, destructive left. In this video, she shows that she is supporting Pauline Hanson in her battle with the despicable Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi, whose bigoted record speaks for itself. What an ironic joke that the appeal judge found in favour of Faruqi – Hanson was racist in her reply to Faruqi’s nastiness – when it is clear that, in all her actions and speeches, Faruqi hates white Anglo people.

Let me allude to a matter here that is of great significance. Do you see it? Joanna is actually a dark woman. Her ancestry is likely Indian or Sri Lankan, or somewhere in that part of the world. Who would dispute that she’s Australian? Who, except the small band of nutters who the bigots in the media use to smear the rest of us? As Pauline says, ethnicity isn’t the point. It is the people who are unashamedly incompatible with Australian culture, people who hate Australia and Australians, who are here to grab their piece of real estate, set up their enclave and pursue the hegemony of their culture.

Feminism is a hateful, dangerous ideology

Posted on by
Reply


‘Feminism is a Hateful & Dangerous Ideology that is Destroying the West. Janice Fiamengo‘

Feminism is in an unending war against men, families and civilisation. It is undermining our society, destroying relationships between men and women, making both males and females unhappy – and it is destroying our institutions.

So says Prof. Janice Fiamengo, a retired professor from the University of Ottawa, a former feminist and the author of the new book “The Goddess That Failed: Feminism’s Unending War Against Men, Families and Civilization Itself”.

White Anglo-Celtic males – they’re the problem

Posted on by
Reply

The first reports I saw of the Helen Haines attack showed serious-faced members of the intelligence community discussing in grave tones the background of the attacker. Even his name was mentioned, when in so many cases of crime and violence the name and cultural background are kept secret. For example, they can keep it quiet, but the mention of gangs and machetes is a signal that a certain cultural group is involved.

But the bare-faced mention of Brendan Nugent told me immediately where the reporting and investigation were going. Of course, the ABC, that great propagandist instrument for the woke traitor class, was right onto the case, salivating with the anticipation of interviews, reports and articles about the far right.

Alas, they were robbed. Brendan Nugent was one of their own. They had to scramble like hell to adjust to the knowledge that one of their own perpetrated one of the most brutal, violent attacks on anyone, let alone a politician.

George Christensen got it all right HERE … And Daily Insight (highly recommended) covered it below.

Men are simply guilty – no discussion

Posted on by
Reply

Television personality Marc Fennell is running a series on SBS about the manosphere. It’s the usual superficial, biased stuff about how figures like Andrew Tate influence young men. To most men, types like Andrew Tate are shallow, contemptible males who would only influence a minority of weak-minded, dependent boys who lack the guidance of the right men.

Most men are concerned about the destructive bias against males across all sectors of society, a state brought about by the success of the Great Feminisation, as Helen Andrews has outlined. This is where the substantial dialogue is.

Many boys are hearing the complaints of their male seniors, as well as that of mothers, sisters, and girlfriends who are appalled at the vicious treatment of their men. It’s no use telling a son or a daughter who love their father that he is essentially vicious.

Foremost among feminism’s critics is Janice Fiamengo, who appears here alongside like-minded colleagues. This is a compelling discussion.

Useless political dilettante Monique Ryan

Posted on by
Reply

What’s wrong with the men in the Kooyong Electorate, where Monique Ryan is the federal member? How could they vote for this feminist, man-hating, fake politician? Don’t they realise that in voting for Ryan, they’re voting against themselves?

As Avi Yemini points out in the video below, Ryan is no different from the Greens with their poisonous, feminist, far-left platform. People shouldn’t forget her ridiculous husband running around removing opponents’ political signs prior to Election Day, an indication of their dilettante mentality.

Ryan is one person men should work to get rid of at the next federal election. She is a paradigm example of Helen Andrews’ thesis on the Great Feminisation.