The betrayal of the elites – strife is ahead
Reply
Author Archives: admin
Update and review
As I said in a previous post, my comments, mostly citing other commenters, are a small part of my activities. Most of my time is spent on my writing and research for my stories. I am now busy with the sixth book of the SIXTIES SERIES, DREAMS TO NIGHTMARE. I’m at the 50,000 word mark, with an estimation of around 100,000 to complete the story.
In the meantime, I have received a favourable review of Book 3, COUNTERCULTURE DREAMS: A 1960S STORY HERE.
Warning to Pauline Hanson – drop the Hastie attack
I’ve spent many years articulating my thoughts on conservatism and what a political party should do to satisfy my conservative ideals. While I was once an ordinary Menzies Liberal Party supporter, I would now be considered by many to be far right, which is why, I suppose, I support One Nation. One Nation’s suite of policies comes closest to what I want. It’s a joy to see at last many in the electorate waking up to the damage the leftist parties are doing (and have done) to the Nation. It’s even more encouraging to see the polls putting One Nation as the preferred party. On present indications, the 2026 Victorian state election and the coming federal election are One Nation’s to lose.
I say, to lose.
They’ll do that by doing what conservative groups often do – by shooting themselves in the foot and not checking the crackpots. Attacking a highly admired and respected Australian like Andrew Hastie will not turn out well. Have some of the people commenting on the video below never heard of political prudence, of picking your battles?
The warning is there for Pauline Hanson and Barnaby Joyce: drop the Hastie attack. Attacking Hastie is gold for Labor and the other leftist parties. It’s brilliant for the media, who will do all they can to torpedo any chance One Nation has.
Lindsay Clancy – Feminist psychosis
Ave Christe Rex
Will this tip men over the edge?
Lindsay Clancy hysteria
No, We Are Not All Lindsay Clancy
Some of us feel more like Patrick: helpless in the presence of unstable women
Janice Fiamengo, Sep 04, 2026
The only thing more striking than the adulation that has erupted in response to Lindsay Clancy’s admitted killing of her three children has been the torrent of anger and suspicion poured out against then-husband Patrick Clancy.
I can’t think of a single example, recent or historical, in which a bereaved mother, her children dead at her ex-husband’s hand, has been subject to anything other than profound sympathy.
It’s not uncommon for such mothers to become revered public figures, campaigning for changes in law or public opinion, and applauded for their “courage” in picking up the pieces of their lives.
One such is Claire Throssell, a British mother whose ex-husband killed their two sons and himself in 2014 by setting their house afire. No one has publicly speculated that Throssell drove her ex-husband to the deed. No one alleged that police should have more closely investigated her actions on the days leading up to the crime.
Throssell, in fact, was centrally involved in a successful feminist campaign to rewrite UK custody law in order to change the presumption that it is generally good for children to have contact with both parents after divorce. The new legislation, not yet formalized, will mean that even fewer divorced fathers will be able to maintain close contact with their children.
The Lindsay Clancy case – Is it a watershed moment?
Is it a watershed moment in the relations between men and women? Is it a sign that men have absolutely had enough of women and their emotional instability? This is the first of a series of comments I will post in answer to those questions.
*****
Lindsay Clancy and the Perennial Innocence of Killer-Mothers
Western criminal law has been soft on violent mothers for at least the past 250 years
Janice Fiamengo, Aug 25, 2026
The headlines are standard: “Women in pink rally in support of Lindsay Clancy who is on trial for killing 3 children,’” “America’s saddest murder trial: mental health in focus in Lindsay Clancy case,” “Lindsay Clancy’s trial shows how badly the system fails mothers,” and “Everyone Failed Lindsay Clancy.”
The headlines look away from the actual victims in the case: the three helpless children who were strangled to death in early 2023. All the sympathetic emphasis is on their mother, portrayed as a tragic figure allegedly “failed” by others and not morally responsible for her horrific act.
As in many cases of mothers who murder their children (I discuss other recent cases here), Lindsay Clancy has defenders aplenty eager to cry for her and proclaim their solidarity (for one compilation, see here). Some are even willing to say that they have felt as she allegedly felt—eager to dispatch their children. Her grisly act has provoked masses of donations to a GoFundMe account (reportedly at one million dollars) as well as enthusiastic rallies of (mostly) women proclaiming her innocence.
Many pink-themed supporters insist on asserting, without logical or evidentiary foundation, that it was Patrick Clancy, Lindsay’s then-husband, who deserves the lion’s share of the blame, whether for failing to support his wife adequately during her post-partum depression or even, as some allege, for killing the children himself and then convincing his mentally fragile wife to take the blame.
Non Nobis Domine
The inspiring masculine end to Kenneth Brenaugh’s production of Henry V.
Do women abuse boys?
News.com.au presented a report yesterday of a teacher jailed for ‘raping’ a teenage boy: Teacher who raped student, 15, sobbed as she was jailed for 12 years. One might wonder how common such sexual abuse is. After all, aren’t we led to believe that only men are guilty of such horrendous crimes? The video below gives an insight into this issue.