Author Archives: admin

Concocting history – the non-existence wars with the Aborigines

Posted on by
Reply

Robert Hill is at the forefront of those powerfully challenging the stories concocted by government-funded groups who are furiously rewriting Australian history. A curse on those institutions that ought to defend Australia but are collapsing like a house of cards. Australians need someone like Pauline Hanson to have the guts not only to defend the truth but to stop the colossal amounts of money going to the fat cats of the Aboriginal industry.

indig giles

The ‘Wars’ That Weren’t

Robert Hill, Quadrant, Jun 23 2026

Reports and Senate Estimates evidence suggest there is a “Frontier Wars” display being developed within the Australian War Memorial’s pre-1914 treatment, with  suggestions that the relevant pre-1914 gallery space may be around 400 square metres. The precise public plan remains difficult to identify, which is itself part of the problem.

There is no publicly available record that explains the evidentiary basis for the inclusion of such a gallery and its contravention of the AWM charter. No clear public criteria have been produced. No public account explains how the Memorial proposes to distinguish war from massacre, reprisal, murder, policing, punitive expedition, settler violence, food raiding, stock spearing or localised tribal conflict.

Read the rest HERE . . .

The Great Feminization – Helen Andrews

Posted on by
Reply

Helen Andrews might not have fully demonstrated her thesis that women are at the centre or the cause of civilisational collapse, but much of what she asserts about the general difference between female and male moral thinking and decision-making makes sense and is observable. The script of this video is below.

Do you want to put it into a single sentence? You could say that feminisation equals wokeness. Everything you could think of as wokeness is simply an epiphenomenon (a by-product) of demographic feminisation.

Continue reading →

The suicide of a civlisation

Posted on by
Reply

‘Whiteness is the most violent fuckin’ system to ever breathe.’

The above is a declaration uttered by a ranting black activist in Joomi Kim’s video. It would be pointless to say, in reply, that one should survey the social status of the black population in America (there are abundant statistics), then survey the civilisational status of the black African states and then compare them with the countries of the West that are centuries ahead in every measure of civilisation.

In recent years, I have mused on the fact, everywhere evident, that I have the privilege of living during times of civilizational collapse. I must sit back of an evening and watch my kind destroying what took centuries to develop.

‘Diversity is our strength’ – Australia’s Marxists at the ABC and SBS

Posted on by
Reply

‘Diversity is our strength’ is incoherent. It’s a political slogan dreamt up by the left to support their dominance. Unity is a nation’s strength and is won by agreements. Agreements cannot be established between people who hate each other or who are incompatible with the foundational agreements of unity.

North and South

Posted on by
Reply

Apart from the gushing over Richard Armitage/John Thorton, for which I have little feeling, I found this a very interesting presentation that came out of the blue on my feed. I agree with the presenter. North and South, the television series, based on Elizabeth Gaskell’s novel of the same name, is one of the best of its type. Richard Armitage and Daniela Denby-Ashe are perfect in the roles of John Thornton and Margaret Hale, whose lips are mesmerising. As for Fitzwilliam Darcy, I think there’s enough in Pride and Prejudice to suggest he would have been pretty tough as a landowner.

Productions of Pride and Prejudice

Posted on by
Reply

The video below presents an interesting discussion about Netflix’s coming version of Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice as compared with previous productions. I made the following comment about the previous productions:

The 1980 version with Elizabeth Garvie and David Rintoul lacks the production values of the 1995 and 2005 versions, but it is more faithful to the story and the characters. Colin Firth may appeal to the female audience, but he does not play Jane Austen’s Darcy. Though without the same appeal, David Rintoul is closer to Austen’s Darcy. I invite people to actually read Jane Austen’s descriptions of Darcy and the dialogue he has in the story. The same holds for Elizabeth Garvie’s Lizzie, who maintains her sweetness and refinement while tearing Darcy apart in the drawing room scenes. Jennifer Ehle’s Lizzie is too vulgar to be an authentic Jane Austen Lizzie. As for Mr Collins, the two actors who played the part in the later versions made a farce of the character, particularly David Bamber in the 1995 version. Mr Collins was a pompous fool, but, as Charlotte Lucas pointed out, he was educated with a respectable position in society. He didn’t eat like a grunting pig. I regularly watch the 1980 version and enjoy it each time.