Invasion march hatred, flag burning, antisemitic abuse, Palestinian flags, and so much more

Below is Channel Nine’s fairly comprehensive coverage of the festivities on Australia Day. Among the scenes of the recognisable Marxist-inspired hatred, in this instance through whipped-up, white Aboriginal fury, we see mostly peaceful scenes of Australians marching with their flag held proudly aloft.

Imagine if an Australian burnt the Aboriginal flag, a political creation in 1971. There would be combustible outrage.

To top off the hate-filled scenes, we see the radical Palestinian flag, fluttering over the white-hot hatred to demonstrate the treachery, treason, and cowardice of our so-called leaders.

The ABC sponsoring hatred – again

The inimitable ABC has provided a national platform for white, reinvented Aboriginal Tony Amstrong to spew his hatred of white people and the nation they created on which he sits in all his parasitic glory. NB: Armstrong has a white mother.

ANDREW BOLT: ABC’s ‘divisive new TV show’ released just in time to ‘trash’ Australia Day

Making up history

‘For more than half a century, one of Australia’s most prominent historians, Keith Windschuttle, demonstrated how large parts of Australian historiography abandoned evidence in favour of politically useful invention.’

The Fabricated ‘Invasion’

Robert Hill, Quadrant, Jan 17 2026

History is not a matter of feeling. It is constrained by numbers, capacity, logistics, and human organisation. When those constraints are discarded, history is not reinterpreted; it is fabricated.

For more than half a century, one of Australia’s most prominent historians, Keith Windschuttle, demonstrated how large parts of Australian historiography abandoned evidence in favour of politically useful invention. He showed how, once facts become inconvenient, they are quietly replaced with conjecture, inflation, and narrative assertion. The result is not a difference of emphasis, but the construction of an entirely fictitious past.

The modern claim that Australia was “invaded” in 1788 is sustained only by redefining invasion until it means nothing at all. It survives only by emptying the word invasion of all meaning and redeploying it as a delegitimising device: a term used not to describe what occurred, but to imply that the British settlement itself was unlawful or morally void from the outset.

Taken to its logical conclusion, this distortion no longer describes a historical event at all. Australia Day becomes not a commemoration of a specific occurrence, but a site of symbolic competition. Invasion DaySurvival DayDay of Mourning — each renaming widens the moral claim while narrowing the history. The particular fate of the Gadigal is no longer examined on its own terms but abstracted into emblem and slogan, their world dissolved into an ever-renewing language of activism. As names multiply, meaning thins, and historical fact is progressively displaced.

An invasion presupposes organised defenders, opposing forces, surplus military power, and the violent seizure and holding of territory from a society capable of resisting. None of these conditions existed at Sydney Cove.

A Landing Is Not an Invasion

To say Australia was “invaded” because British ships landed at Sydney Cove is to collapse distance, scale, and political reality into a slogan. From a continental perspective, it is akin to claiming that France, Portugal, and Denmark were all invaded simultaneously because a number foreign vessels came ashore in Greece. A localised landing does not constitute the invasion of an entire continent, particularly where there was no relationship with, nor knowledge of the vast majority of that landmass. Australia, by scale alone,  is roughly twice as large as Western Europe.

Read the rest here . . .

Marxist vandals have free hand

Australia Associated Press reported today:

Vandals have defaced two historic monuments in the lead-up to Australia Day despite efforts to protect against targeted attacks. 

“Death to ‘Australia'” was spray-painted on one of the two statues targeted between Wednesday night and Thursday morning at Melbourne’s oldest park, Flagstaff Gardens. 

Heavy machinery was used to tear down the Pioneer monument, erected in 1871, before the badly-damaged ruins were vandalised, police believe.

The five-metre tall, sandstone obelisk marks the city’s first burial site.

The nearby Separation memorial, erected in 1950 to commemorate the founding of the Victorian colony a century earlier, was similarly defaced.

*****

Each year, Marxist vandals are left free to vandalise monuments around the city dedicated to the achievements of the Australian nation, a nation built by the settlers and their descendants. Aboriginals, and even less white reinvented Aborginals, had nothing to do with the nation known as Australia.

We know they are Marxist parasites because we see them and their banners, flags and emblems in the various marches, especially around Australia Day.

‘”This sort of behaviour will not and cannot be tolerated in Melbourne,” Melbourne’s Lord Mayor Nicholas Reece told ABC Radio on Thursday morning.’

Wacko, you go it, Nicholas. You’ll really scare these Marxist thugs.

Nothing will be done. It’ll happen next year unless someone has the guts to go in hard on the creeps responsible. I mean, really hard, devastatingly hard, blood and guts hard. Everyone in the media knows where to find them.

Attack planned for Australia Day

Shocking though it was, I was not at all surprised that two men from a particular community in Sydney gunned down innocent Australians enjoying a picnic. The signs were all over the place, in Australia and throughout Europe, especially in countries with large migrant populations from the Middle East.

We’ve had fifty years of terrorism. We know what it is and where it comes from. It was simply to be expected that two men would emerge from the protection of that community and, with relish, kill innocent people.

You would have to be culpably naive or partisan not to realise that others with the same views and intentions were residing in that same community – and planning for action.

*****

PhD candidate Sepehr Saryazdi, accused of planning terror attack on Australia Day, denied bail

a man in a graduation gown and cap holding a degree
Sepehr Saryazdi appeared in Brisbane Magistrates Court on Thursday. (Supplied)

A CSIRO PhD candidate accused of planning to use Molotov cocktails in a terror attack on the Gold Coast on Australia Day has been denied bail.

Sepehr Saryazdi appeared in the Brisbane Magistrates Court on Thursday after being charged with one count of acts in preparation for or planning a terrorist act.

During a bail application, the court heard the 24-year-old had been brought to the attention of counter terrorism officers after information was received about things he was allegedly posting online.

Commonwealth prosecutor Ellie McDonald told the court the alleged offending related to Facebook messenger chats within a private group containing over 50 people.

Ms McDonald told the court he had allegedly also encouraged others to do the same.

“He says: ‘I will be leading the Gold Coast riots on Jan 26 if you guys know people in Melbourne, let them know so they can start buying vodka bottles early to stockpile in batches,'” she said.

“He also states: ‘if arrested the key is to stay calm and collected, when put into questioning remind them what you did is purely logical given the current trajectory of this nation.'”

Ms McDonald told the court he also allegedly told the group members they “need to make the police doubt their own world views and convince them to quit their job”.

Read the rest here . . .