Professor Nigel Biggar and Dr Stephen Chavura discuss the historical nonsense that is shoved down the public’s throats and is force-fed to our schoolchildren.
For examples of state indoctrination, there’s no need to go to Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or Communist China. We have our own indefatigable Goebbelses, beginning with the government-funded ABC and SBS.
Below is Channel Nine’s fairly comprehensive coverage of the festivities on Australia Day. Among the scenes of the recognisable Marxist-inspired hatred, in this instance through whipped-up, white Aboriginal fury, we see mostly peaceful scenes of Australians marching with their flag held proudly aloft.
Imagine if an Australian burnt the Aboriginal flag, a political creation in 1971. There would be combustible outrage.
To top off the hate-filled scenes, we see the radical Palestinian flag, fluttering over the white-hot hatred to demonstrate the treachery, treason, and cowardice of our so-called leaders.
The inimitable ABC has provided a national platform for white, reinvented Aboriginal Tony Amstrong to spew his hatred of white people and the nation they created on which he sits in all his parasitic glory. NB: Armstrong has a white mother.
ANDREW BOLT: ABC’s ‘divisive new TV show’ released just in time to ‘trash’ Australia Day
‘For more than half a century, one of Australia’s most prominent historians, Keith Windschuttle, demonstrated how large parts of Australian historiography abandoned evidence in favour of politically useful invention.’
Robert Hill, Quadrant, Jan 17 2026
History is not a matter of feeling. It is constrained by numbers, capacity, logistics, and human organisation. When those constraints are discarded, history is not reinterpreted; it is fabricated.
For more than half a century, one of Australia’s most prominent historians, Keith Windschuttle, demonstrated how large parts of Australian historiography abandoned evidence in favour of politically useful invention. He showed how, once facts become inconvenient, they are quietly replaced with conjecture, inflation, and narrative assertion. The result is not a difference of emphasis, but the construction of an entirely fictitious past.
The modern claim that Australia was “invaded” in 1788 is sustained only by redefining invasion until it means nothing at all. It survives only by emptying the word invasion of all meaning and redeploying it as a delegitimising device: a term used not to describe what occurred, but to imply that the British settlement itself was unlawful or morally void from the outset.
Taken to its logical conclusion, this distortion no longer describes a historical event at all. Australia Day becomes not a commemoration of a specific occurrence, but a site of symbolic competition. Invasion Day, Survival Day, Day of Mourning — each renaming widens the moral claim while narrowing the history. The particular fate of the Gadigal is no longer examined on its own terms but abstracted into emblem and slogan, their world dissolved into an ever-renewing language of activism. As names multiply, meaning thins, and historical fact is progressively displaced.
An invasion presupposes organised defenders, opposing forces, surplus military power, and the violent seizure and holding of territory from a society capable of resisting. None of these conditions existed at Sydney Cove.
A Landing Is Not an Invasion
To say Australia was “invaded” because British ships landed at Sydney Cove is to collapse distance, scale, and political reality into a slogan. From a continental perspective, it is akin to claiming that France, Portugal, and Denmark were all invaded simultaneously because a number foreign vessels came ashore in Greece. A localised landing does not constitute the invasion of an entire continent, particularly where there was no relationship with, nor knowledge of the vast majority of that landmass. Australia, by scale alone, is roughly twice as large as Western Europe.
Australia Associated Press reported today:
Vandals have defaced two historic monuments in the lead-up to Australia Day despite efforts to protect against targeted attacks.
“Death to ‘Australia'” was spray-painted on one of the two statues targeted between Wednesday night and Thursday morning at Melbourne’s oldest park, Flagstaff Gardens.
Heavy machinery was used to tear down the Pioneer monument, erected in 1871, before the badly-damaged ruins were vandalised, police believe.
The five-metre tall, sandstone obelisk marks the city’s first burial site.
The nearby Separation memorial, erected in 1950 to commemorate the founding of the Victorian colony a century earlier, was similarly defaced.
*****
Each year, Marxist vandals are left free to vandalise monuments around the city dedicated to the achievements of the Australian nation, a nation built by the settlers and their descendants. Aboriginals, and even less white reinvented Aborginals, had nothing to do with the nation known as Australia.
We know they are Marxist parasites because we see them and their banners, flags and emblems in the various marches, especially around Australia Day.
‘”This sort of behaviour will not and cannot be tolerated in Melbourne,” Melbourne’s Lord Mayor Nicholas Reece told ABC Radio on Thursday morning.’
Wacko, you go it, Nicholas. You’ll really scare these Marxist thugs.
Nothing will be done. It’ll happen next year unless someone has the guts to go in hard on the creeps responsible. I mean, really hard, devastatingly hard, blood and guts hard. Everyone in the media knows where to find them.
Despite rejecting his status as a historian, Robert Hill, who frequently writes for Quadrant, is one of the best contemporary commentators on colonial history. He makes laughable some of the ‘historical’ claims by white reinvented Aboriginals who are mounting a coup rather than an attempt at separatism – so successful has their political activism been. He has produced a book (see link below) that can be downloaded free of charge.
THE LAST OF THE
GADIGAL
A Short work on early Sydney and the myth of invasion
Robert Hill