For a long time, I have been talking about the betrayal of Australians by the elites. I have warned that the ruling class is feeding rebellion. I see strife on the horizon. It turns out that I’m not the only one. David Betz, Professor of War in the Modern World at King’s College London, thinks so too. There is an extremely important message in this video. It explains in detail the fears I’ve had about the future for the last ten years.
I made the following comment on the video below: Fr Gerald is right. It is horrific what’s happening to the Church, both as regards Pachamama and the pretend nun Natalie Becquart. Pachamama is clearly paganism, and Becquart is preaching a sort of direct or participatory democracy that the 1960s radicals tried to impose on Western countries. I know. I was there.
Becquart is a political operative hiding behind a pretend religious order. She preaches a political philosophy directly opposed to that of the Church of the centuries. Becquart is a representative figure in Helen Andrews’ Great Feminisation. She and her feminist gang have made significant inroads into the Church’s structure. How can the Vatican be so stupidly naive? I despair of them. The only way forward I can see is to do what the left do so well: organise within parishes, kick out the direct democratists, get a sound, faithful priest, and introduce classical catechetical instruction. The pews will start to fill again.
*****
Why Is a Vatican Official Joining a Pachamama Ritual? Bishops Question Synodality
Raymond Arroyo, Fr. Gerald Murray, and Robert Royal examine growing questions over the direction of synodality as bishops and cardinals call on Rome to finally define what it means—and whether the process is actually strengthening the Church.
Plus, the Posse reacts to a controversial Pachamama ceremony in Peru involving a Vatican official, new tensions surrounding the Traditional Latin Mass, surprising Church appointments, and a Spanish priest’s controversial homily on the Assumption followed by a bizarre liturgical dance.
I watched a few programs when ‘Sex and the City’ first appeared and saw bits and pieces later. From the beginning, I thought the series took a deep dive into grubbiness and nastiness. Carrie Bradshaw, the leading character, was the leading grub. I deplored its top-rating status. How could such a show help young women? I was pleased to find Maureen Callahan’s video savaging the series and Sarah Jessica Parker who played Carrie Bradshaw. She explains how harmful the series is to young women. See a related video on what the hookup culture means for most women HERE.
This is an excellent discussion from Quillette. Highly recommended to watch.
The Gender Pay Gap Reversed: Why Young Women Now Out-Earn Men with David Maywald
You don’t have to scroll far into TikTok to find a series of middle-class school brats promoting a day off school to demonstrate against ‘fascist’ Pauline Hanson. For those of us who lived through the 1960s’ Marxist organisation of school kids’ demonstrations, it is deja vu all over again. The same rhetoric, the same slogans, and the same insufferable teenage brats, especially the insufferable female brats, who one will see at the forefront of leftist activity.
What will the school authorities do? Of course, they’ll cave into the brats from cushy middle-class homes, given great support by our propagandist ABC/SBS.
Tell Pauline Hanson you’ll vote for One Nation at the 2028 federal election if she does something about this sort of schoolgirl-boy delinquency.
In this video, Joomi Kim surveys and assesses recent novels by feminists that are being promoted and selling well. Her basic judgment is that ‘so much of it is infected by woke ideologies.’
Now, in this, Joomi is doing a service for men. She is reading novels full of feminist man-hatred, so we don’t have to read them, while it’s important for men to know what the enemy is thinking and scheming. Too many men are unaware of the permanent turmoil of women’s feelings.
Ignorance is not bliss in this case. Feminist man-hatred is embedded in all areas of modern society, which certainly affects, for one, a man’s employment opportunities. I recommend that men who come to my site watch this video. Forewarned is forearmed.
Janice Fiamengo, Aug 05, 2026
Feminism poses a threat to everything good in western culture, perhaps especially to women’s capacity to love, reason, and exercise self-restraint.
I was an adherent of feminism before I became a critic. I have felt its euphoric exultation and its self-flattering conviction of moral purity. Later, I recognized its hubris and moral hollowness.
I am familiar with feminism’s core texts, from Mary Wollstonecraft to Mary Anne Franks, having studied them and believed in them for years. I understand the psychology and the history of the movement because I lived inside it for many years.
Unlike others who have criticized feminism’s excesses, I contend that although there are some moderate feminists, there was never a moderate feminism inspired by reasonable goals and untainted by anti-male fanaticism. Feminism did not go wrong at some point in history, whether after the Second Wave or before, whether in anti-sex or pro-sex zeal. It was always rooted in resentment and envy, warped by utopian longings and false notions of female moral superiority.
No, not even bullying, cancelling, and jail can change them.
Students, particularly males, wishing to achieve a useful vocational qualification would do well to choose something from TAFE before the woke crackpots get a hold on that, too.
Helen Andrews might not have fully demonstrated her thesis that women are at the centre or the cause of civilisational collapse, but much of what she asserts about the general difference between female and male moral thinking and decision-making makes sense and is observable. The script of this video is below.
Do you want to put it into a single sentence? You could say that feminisation equals wokeness. Everything you could think of as wokeness is simply an epiphenomenon (a by-product) of demographic feminisation.
Continue reading