Channel 9 – You’re pathetic – again.
I’m sure Pauline Hanson realises that ninety percent of the media are after her. There’ll be no limits or depths to the lies, distortions, smears, sneers, and mockery One Nation and its supporters will have to endure for the foreseeable future. The irony is that the more the media attacks Pauline and One Nation, the more her supporters increase.
The ABC remains silent, likely wishing someone would act on the suggestion.
I’ve been following the YouTuber Oceania Unfiltered for some time. Indeed, I have listed him on my page of recommended You Tubers. I follow him because he tackles the political issues that are important to me – like the gigantic Aboriginal scam – and he does it with penetrating analysis backed by evidence.
Now, the ABC woke nasties, backed by a billion-dollar investigatory team, have feverishly grubbed around and succeeded in digging up information about Oceania Unfiltered that obviously has them wetting their government-funded pants from joy. The information is laid out in a very, very, long, tedious, smug article by Jonathan Hair, Michael Workman and Isaure Duruy. The article is hilariously tagged with ‘Disinformation and Misinformation’.
You’ve got to laugh, haven’t you? Here we have the supreme exponents of woke propaganda pointing their finger at someone for his alleged misinformation and disinformation when conservatives have for years been forced to swallow from the billion-dollar government-funded ABC a stream of lies, misrepresentations, distortions, omissions, smears, sneers, mockery, reputational destruction, and every other foul tactic and tag that one could conceive.
There’s a good reason for a multitude of Australians screaming for the defunding of the ABC and SBS. The link to the article is below. I urge people to read this paradigm example of the ABC’s political grubbiness and deceit, and then watch the YouTube episode under the link. Judge whether Brazilian Junior Lutero De Alcantara has not articulated and argued his case convincingly — with the help of AI.
VIDEO DELETED
Don’t for one moment think the ABC gaslighters and deceivers don’t use AI to propagate their woke ideology.
POSTSCRIPT: Unfortunately, it seems the ABC report has forced Junior Lutero to remove some of his excellent videos, including the one above. He now advises that his videos are made using AI, but they are no more competently argued than his past videos.
This is the filthy way the ABC people operate. They can be proud of themselves. The solution is to elect One Nation at the next federal election (2028), and insist they break up the ABC and remove the rotting sections.
Pauline Hanson was (and is) correct about the Australian Aboriginals being the most primitive people on earth at the time of settlement. This was the shared opinion by the Europeans who first observed them. Of course, we’re talking about full-blood Aboriginals untouched by European civilisation and not the reinvented white Aboriginals who have grown up and been educated in ordinary Australian society. In the Quadrant article below, Robert Hill comments.
*****
Robert Hill, Quadrant, September 15 2026
Pauline Hanson has once again committed the apparently unforgivable Australian political sin of saying something about Aboriginal history that everyone is expected to condemn before anybody examines whether it is true.
The remarkable thing is that the controversy is not even about something she said this week. In September 2025, appearing on the Jamie J podcast, Hanson was discussing what she regards as the warping of Australian education. She recounted being contacted by a teacher from Western Australia who complained that curriculum previously devoted to Australian history and civil rights was instead being directed towards Aboriginal culture and language. It was in that context, questioning what children were being asked to celebrate and why, that Hanson asked what Aboriginal Australians had achieved over some 60,000 years and described them as “the most primitive race on Earth”. The interview sat largely unnoticed for a year. On September 14, the remarks resurfaced in the national media and abruptly became a political controversy.
That context does not determine whether her language was justified, but it does matter. Hanson was making an argument about the historical content being taught in Australian schools, not simply announcing a racial epithet without context.
The timing is difficult to ignore. These were not newly discovered words. They had been publicly available for twelve months. Yet they suddenly became a national scandal at the very moment One Nation had emerged as a major electoral force, polling in the mid-20s and challenging both major parties.
That does not establish that somebody coordinated a political hit. But it gives the affair the strong appearance of political excavation: an old recording dragged back into the light at the moment its author has become politically dangerous.
Below is a highly laudatory review by Daniel Herborn that appeared 7 September 2026 on ABC online (where else?) of a YA (Young Adult) book, BAD QUEER. YA caters for children from 12 to 18 years. BAD QUEER was published in March 2026 by Allen & Unwin, which tells you what sort of publisher Allen & Unwin is and what sort of editorial team they have, which is likely to be 100% female.
The book, the publisher, and the (female) editorial team are yet another demonstration of how far Australia has corrupted from the standards, principles, moral outlook, language, and rationality that prevailed until around thirty years ago.
Mourn Australia and hope someone will have the backbone to take steps to restore our nation.
*****
Daniel Herborn, ABC, 7 September 2026
Surya feels like a bad queer. When an ice cream man misgenders them, they stay silent.
“I pray for a sharper tongue,” they think when a classmate harasses them for not looking like either a boy or a girl.
Surya is the protagonist of Bad Queer, a young adult novel-in-verse written by London-based Gayathiri Kamalakanthan and illustrated by Chicago artist Chi Nwosu.
Coming into their final year at school, Surya has come out to their parents, who are queer and non-binary, and their close friend Maha, but not to everyone.
They’re also yet to have their first romantic relationship.
This is just another case of highly-placed woke women crashing an enterprise by following their disaster-proven ideology. When will men in the corporate world grow a backbone and do the rationally obvious. It’s also another case that proves Helen Andrews’ thesis about the Great Feminisation to be spot on.
The Code of Chivalry was a moral and social framework guiding medieval knights, emphasizing honor, loyalty, bravery, courtesy, and the protection of the weak.
Origins and Historical Context
The Code of Chivalry emerged between the 11th and 12th centuries, blending Germanic warrior traditions with Christian ethics and feudal obligations. It transformed the rough warrior ethos of early medieval Europe into a system rooted in faith, justice, and moral restraint, guiding knights not only in battle but also in their social and spiritual lives. The Church played a key role, encouraging knights to defend Christianity, protect the defenseless, and exercise self-discipline.
Core Virtues and Principles
The Code of Chivalry emphasized several key virtues: