1960s Part 3

Liza’s Journey: Australia in the Sixties, Part 3

1960s Part 1 1960s Part 2

Mervyn Bendle, Quadrant, Dec 20 2025

Radical Thought. The Sydney Push had a lot more to it than the  Libertarianism and libertinism we discussed in our previous article. As Liza discovered, it appealed also to those drawn to challenging ideas and ideologies, as well as to those, like her, who felt  they had profound questions to ask. Prior to the Sixties, such youthful intellectual hunger might have been satisfied by joining the Communist Party. However, its authoritarianism, the revelations about the horrors of Stalinism, and the 1956 Soviet invasion of Hungary (right) discredited the Party for many. This was especially the case with Liza, who heard of the horrors first-hand from those workmates at the store who were amongst the 300,000 Hungarians who’d fled into exile, with many coming to Australia. Consequently, the Libertarian Society and the Push helped fill an ideological vacuum that lasted until the arrival of the New Left.

Intellectual Appeal. Moreover, they had a intellectual basis, derived from John Anderson’s iconoclastic philosophy, which had survived over 40 years of critique and conflict with the Establishment. The folk who made up the core membership of the Push took ideas seriously and this foundation gave it legitimacy for the intellectually-inclined, including not only the older members but younger folk like Liza or Germaine Greer, who particularly noticed the difference between Melbourne and Sydney: Melbourne’s ‘Drift’ was romantic in relationships and sloppy in reasoning while the Push (left) was realist in relationships and rigorous in reasoning.

Read the rest here . . .

India’s caste system

I did a search on India’s caste system, and this is what I found:

India’s caste system is a hierarchical social structure rooted in ancient varna classifications, further divided into thousands of hereditary jatis, influencing social, economic, and political life for centuries.

Historical Origins

The caste system in India originated in ancient times, primarily through the varna system, which divided society into four broad categories: Brahmins (priests), Kshatriyas (warriors and rulers), Vaishyas (traders and merchants), and Shudras (laborers and artisans) Wikipedia+1. Outside this hierarchy were the Dalits (historically called “Untouchables”) and Adivasis (tribal communities), who faced social exclusion Wikipedia+1. Over time, the varna system became more complex with the emergence of jatis, localized hereditary groups often linked to specific occupations, customs, and marriage rules Encyclopedia Britannica+2.’

Is this mentality what we want brought to Australia? Of course, the multiculturalists have nothing to say. They’re too preoccupied with de-whiting and de-Anglosising Australia.

Modi and his expansionist plans

You thought a whole lot of nice Indian people were coming to Australia to join in and be part of the nation. Modi’s nationalist rally in the heart of Melbourne, supported by Labor’s multiculturalist duo, PM Albanese and Premier Jacinta Allan, should have undeceived you. India is not what most Australians think it is.

Robert Menzies’ prescient warning

Only a drooling ideologue would deny the key argument here. Only homogeneous societies possess the unity to survive. Multiculturalism is incoherent. Present-day Australia shows Menzies to be essentially correct. A survivable nation cannot tolerate imported colonies whose members publicly proclaim their allegiance to another nation.

The Indian PM greets his ecstatic Australian colony

The Indian PM Narendra Modi was all satisfied smiles as his Indian colony greeted him at a rally in Melbourne. Our leftist Prime Minister obsequiously copied Modi’s Indian greeting as they walked through the ecstatic crowd. A humble bow with hands together was appropriate for this prime minister. Australian custom and tradition are a distant last with Albo.

The larger the colony, the more influence it has on the electoral process. Albo knows this.