Grace Tame autistic

Here’s another view of Grace Tame. Among other deficits, the video claims that Tame is autistic. Now, one is not named autistic for nothing. There must be something that distinguishes an autistic person from the average person who does not suffer from this state. After all, there are special schools and government strategies to support such people.

A fair question is to what extent autism affects Tame’s wild, uncontrolled behaviour, behaviour denouncing the nation that gave her the Australian of the Year Award.

Grace Tame – Overlooking sexual violence as a tool of war

Grace Tame came to the public’s attention through a case of sexual abuse. Her struggle for justice earned her the Australian of the Year award. In the video below, Chris Kenny interviews the Deputy Foreign Minister of Israel. Minister Sharren Haskel asserts that Tame’s call to globalise the Intifada implicitly excuses the barbaric 7 October attack during which sexual violence was a tool of war.

Serious questions should be asked about Tame’s state of mind.

The ABC defends racism

Hugh Marks, ABC CEO, demonstrates here that the government-funded ABC is hopelessly and unapologetically in the control of the rabid Marxist left and that a responsible, fair-dealing government would withhold funding until the ABC is reorganised to fulfil its charter to cater to all sections of the Australian community.

The future of the ABC should be at the top of the list of priorities of parties wishing to govern Australia. There is much work to be done on this.

Grace Tame – her friends should be worried

Grace Tame’s frequent manic outbursts provide a worrying record. Her shrieking ‘from Gadigal to Gaza globalise the Intifada’ in front of Muslim flags, Muslim fanatics, Marxist maggots, like Josh Lees, and sundry leftist crackpots in front of Sydney’s Town Hall should have her family and friends consulting psychology specialists. Any normal person watching would have grave concerns about her mental balance.

The Feminisation of everything

Helen Andrews’ article in Compact’s online magazine exploded on the internet in October 2025. Commentaries and interviews with Andrews followed rapidly. I will post links following this post. It is curious that, for the first time, I recently came across this quote from George Orwell’s 1984:

“It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy.”

Coincidentally, I recently found this shocking demonstration of the fundamental difference between male and female moral and political thinking HERE.

How many of us have had to give up talking to a screaming, overwrought female, as here with this poor man?

*****

The Great Feminization

Helen Andrews, COMPACT, 16 October 2025

In 2019, I read an article about Larry Summers and Harvard that changed the way I look at the world. The author, writing under the pseudonym “J. Stone,” argued that the day Larry Summers resigned as president of Harvard University marked a turning point in our culture. The entire “woke” era could be extrapolated from that moment, from the details of how Summers was cancelled and, most of all, who did the cancelling: women.

The basic facts of the Summers case were familiar to me. On January 14, 2005, at a conference on “Diversifying the Science and Engineering Workforce,” Larry Summers gave a talk that was supposed to be off the record. In it, he said that female underrepresentation in hard sciences was partly due to “different availability of aptitude at the high end” as well as taste differences between men and women “not attributable to socialization.” Some female professors in attendance were offended and sent his remarks to a reporter, in defiance of the off-the-record rule. The ensuing scandal led to a no-confidence vote by the Harvard faculty and, eventually, Summers’s resignation.

The essay argued that it wasn’t just that women had cancelled the president of Harvard; it was that they’d cancelled him in a very feminine way. They made emotional appeals rather than logical arguments. “When he started talking about innate differences in aptitude between men and women, I just couldn’t breathe because this kind of bias makes me physically ill,” said Nancy Hopkins, a biologist at MIT. Summers made a public statement clarifying his remarks, and then another, and then a third, with the apology more insistent each time. Experts chimed in to declare that everything Summers had said about sex differences was within the scientific mainstream. These rational appeals had no effect on the mob hysteria. 

This cancellation was feminine, the essay argued, because all cancellations are feminine. Cancel culture is simply what women do whenever there are enough of them in a given organization or field. That is the Great Feminization thesis, which the same author later elaborated upon at book length: Everything you think of as “wokeness” is simply an epiphenomenon of demographic feminization.

The explanatory power of this simple thesis was incredible. It really did unlock the secrets of the era we are living in. Wokeness is not a new ideology, an outgrowth of Marxism, or a result of post-Obama disillusionment. It is simply feminine patterns of behavior applied to institutions where women were few in number until recently. How did I not see it before?

Possibly because, like most people, I think of feminization as something that happened in the past before I was born. When we think about women in the legal profession, for example, we think of the first woman to attend law school (1869), the first woman to argue a case before the Supreme Court (1880), or the first female Supreme Court Justice (1981). 

A much more important tipping point is when law schools became majority female, which occurred in 2016, or when law firm associates became majority female, which occurred in 2023. When Sandra Day O’Connor was appointed to the high court, only 5 percent of judges were female. Today women are 33 percent of the judges in America and 63 percent of the judges appointed by President Joe Biden.

Read the rest HERE . . .

Australia’s foremost white Aboriginal fake

The embarrassing pure-bred white man below is Australia’s all-time champion bull-artist, working a confidence trick that would have few rivals in the history of the world. It is white Aboriginal fake, Bruce Pascoe, author of the White-Aboriginal fairytale DARK EMU. How does he get away with it? Tony Thomas has an answer below.

Pascoe lap-lap

Bruce Pascoe’s Ever-Loyal Tribe

Tony Thomas, Quadrant, Jul 17 2025

With another fiscal year ticked over for Bruce Pascoe’s Black Duck Foods charity,  it’s time for another look at the Dark Emu cult. Why do Pascoe and his Dark Emu thesis of pre-colonial native farmers continue to thrive despite having lost all credibility?

Part I: Pascoe’s Pals at the Copyright Agency

The Black Duck charity must be Australia’s most unusual. It’s the tenant running Pascoe’s 60ha Yumburra Farm at Gipsy Point near Mallacoota. Black Duck picks up all costs for operations and spends cheerfully on improvements to Bruce’s farm. It plants, harvests and markets Bruce’s native seeds, to revive the alleged farming practices of pre-colonial Aborigines.

From inception in 2020 to June 30, 2024, the charity acquired $1.36 million from taxpayers and $1.24 million from tax-deductible donations, a total $2.6 million in free funds. By June 2024 it spent all but $220,000, including $149,000 paid in rent to Bruce, $82,000 to buy his old tractor and farmlet odds and sods, and close to $100,000 buying vehicles and their upkeep.[1]

Bruce emailed his his fans a year ago, “We urgently need your support… To be honest with you Black Duck Foods is currently living hand to mouth … we need your help to keep going.” (My emphases throughout). When the 2024-25 accounts emerge next January we’ll discover how the project’s getting on, or not getting on.

Black Duck’s $2 million-plus outlays since 2020 have generated total farm sales of only $80,000. Hardly surprising as it’s currently pricing its flour from native seeds at $180-360 per kg (depending on volume discounts and species), versus $1.30 for a kilo packet from Woollies today. Pascoe sells his yam daisy seeds for grow-it-yourself fans at 12 cents each.  Such tiny seeds run at about 30 per gram, so it’s expensive to scatter them by the handful.

Rather than proving the viability of pre-colonial farming, Bruce’s demonstration farm has proved the opposite. The lofty ambition of Bruce as a self-proclaimed Yuin, Bunurong and Tasmanian Aborigine is to convert Australians to native bread loaves and bulrush salads, while validating his Dark Emu thesis of pre-colonial farmer towns housing 1000 citizens apiece, or even, at Lake Condah, Victoria,  10,000 farm and fisher-folk. (Dark Emu, p75). Modern-day towns of that size include Broome, Katoomba and Castlemaine, thankfully all improved with sewerage, public servants, Coles for groceries and Kmarts for winter pyjamas.

The real question is how Bruce has got away with his thesis – rather, won laurels for it — for more than a decade.

Read the rest here . . .

The Myths of Indigenous History

Professor Nigel Biggar and Dr Stephen Chavura discuss the historical nonsense that is shoved down the public’s throats and is force-fed to our schoolchildren.

For examples of state indoctrination, there’s no need to go to Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or Communist China. We have our own indefatigable Goebbelses, beginning with the government-funded ABC and SBS.

Invasion march hatred, flag burning, antisemitic abuse, Palestinian flags, and so much more

Below is Channel Nine’s fairly comprehensive coverage of the festivities on Australia Day. Among the scenes of the recognisable Marxist-inspired hatred, in this instance through whipped-up, white Aboriginal fury, we see mostly peaceful scenes of Australians marching with their flag held proudly aloft.

Imagine if an Australian burnt the Aboriginal flag, a political creation in 1971. There would be combustible outrage.

To top off the hate-filled scenes, we see the radical Palestinian flag, fluttering over the white-hot hatred to demonstrate the treachery, treason, and cowardice of our so-called leaders.